randon31415

Didn't a house democrat just recently die? Wouldn't that have made it 215-215 if he was still alive?

We want to stand up to Trump's stock manipulation: but Nacy Pelosi keeps blocking bills making congressional insider trading illegal.

We want to stand up to Trump's support for multiple genocidal dictators, but Chuck Schumer keeps pushing for more weapons to Israel.

We want to make majauana legal, but Kamala Harris keeps touting how she had sent majauana users to jail.

In short, we want democratic leaders who stand for democratic values or at least who don't actively push policies counter to them.

Let's change our universally recognized trademarkible name and change it to a non-trademarkible blowdriver setting! Wait, no one recognizes our name anymore? Undo!

Shouldn't block people. You can make good money by arguing

Is this in the "big beautiful budget bill?" If not, I don't see it passing the senate filibuster.

You could boil these material scientist's jobs down to two things: discovering materials and documenting them. If AI takes over the documentation, then that leaves more time to discover.

Either their will be a default, or their will be massive cuts to one of the medi- programs. Either will cause massive harm.

Hushpuppy underground!

There was a fad of running things through google translate and back several times until you get something funny.

Has that fad returned with a ChatGPT expand -> contract loops?

Can't be done, blame Mojo jojo

Just as a reminder:

Right before the ballot was to be printed, Justice Limbaugh (Nephew to THAT Limbaugh) ruled that the petition circulators did not tell people signing the abortion rights petition that enacting the law would lead to children being able to get sex changes without parental consent; ergo the amendment should be thrown out due to deception.

The petition leaders then went to the Missouri state supreme court arguing that they didn't mislead people by omitting information about sex changes as the amendment was ONLY about abortion right. The state supreme court agreed, the ballot got printed, the amendment passed and then the state republicans refused to implement it because: "we don't want our children getting sex changes without our consent."