Anything that involves statistical mechanics is just black magic. There should be a Nobel prize just for people who are able to wrap their mind around it.
ranzispa
Me: oh it's a reaction scheme, so they start with this and end up with this. I'll assume everything in the middle is correct and they get what I asked them.
Also you harvest them every two weeks. Want to sell them already? Just stick them under a plastic carp for a couple of days and they'll be ripe and yellow.
The bad part is loading trucks of bananas is hard work, those things are heavy.
People are working on that already. Did not work until now as far as I know.
This is a problem that has been known for a while.
Oh, I see. But apparently it was not communicated enough since even a police man took it as a danger.
Regarding live bullets, I was only joking. It was something done in training certain special troops in Italy during world war I. Many people died during training indeed.
Oh, I see. Indeed anonymised data should be fine under GDPR. However it is often very difficult to anonymise data. Some things are easy to anonymise, other are very complex.
For a small company who does not mainly work with data, the easiest solution to comply with GDPR is indeed just deleting the data altogether.
That happens. Still, many companies do not. Some companies are unaware of the legislation.
I was informing one worker of a company of one such law.
Many companies do not break the law even though there are no controls just because that is the right thing to do.
I am aware of the strategy, that falls under the first of the three scenarios I described.
The objective of Ukraine is regaining the entirety of its territories, the strategy is how it gets to that point.
That is why I believe the graph is good and completely correct, but does not really highlight something particularly significant for the war itself.
Are you advising breaking the law just because nobody checks?
I'm pretty sure GDPR requires websites to abide to user requests to delete their data. You may wish to review that with your company.
I am convinced editors got the joke and now shuffle reviewers around just so that the worst one is reviewer 2.