sapient_cogbag

joined 2 years ago
[–] sapient_cogbag@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm trans nonbinary, and I get very strongly bothered (not in this case as you are asking but...) when people suggest that being nonbinary means you aren't trans (or that they are mutually exclusive groups), as my gender is distinct from that which was assigned to me at birth nya.

I share experiences with a lot of other trans people as well and so having people imply that I am separate from that community bothers me.

This combines with the fact that such separation often implies that nonbinary people want or need only a subset of things as binary trans people may often want/need (such as various aspects of medical transition), which is untrue - for example, I have HRT, much like many (but not all) binary trans people want or have, but often people separating "nonbinary" from "trans" seem to operate with the implicit subtext that nonbinary people do not transition or do not transition in ways they consider as "real" or "full" or "as important" as binary transition (not that I am suggesting that is actually a thing, just illustrating the subtextual framing I perceive - its also worth remembering that binary transition pathways/goals/etc. vary a lot between people too).

Not only this but this separation often comes with the implicit subtext/assumption that nonbinary identities are not strongly separated from their assigned-at-birth gender identity. There are certainly nonbinary people like that, but there are also lots of us who have an identity quite far from that assigned at birth ^.^.

Some nonbinary people don't consider themselves trans, but a lot of us do (including me).

In summary, for me this is because my gender identity (strong sense of gender but not one of the "man/woman" genders and instead a third axis with some fem component) is strongly distinct from my AGAB, and I do/want-to-do things that other people in the trans community often-but-not-always do or want to do (such as accessing HRT, legal name change, surgeries (though not conventional binary ones), etc.)

As for the etymology, just think of it as cis=same, trans=different - rather than cis=same, trans=opposite.

[–] sapient_cogbag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Its not just the gesture, its everything else as well. You know, repeating nazi conspiracy theories about jewish people wanting to eliminate """whiteness""", supporting the AfD, etc.

And I think that yes, he would do that. I mean, look at how many people are sanewashing this and trying to pretend he hasn't even done it. Look at the fact he was cheered on by the people in the crowd while doing it.

America (or at least enough parts of it with political attentiveness and less apathy) is so far right that advocating for what amounts to mass ethnic cleansing/purges (as Trump/GOP has done, and as fascists do) is a completely accepted position by at least 30% of voters. Not to mention the plans to suborn the entire US government into a hyper authoritarian, totalising christian nationalist social-regimentation-enforcer, amongst so many other things I can't even count.

[–] sapient_cogbag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

He did a nazi salute and supports the fascist party openly advocating for the naked use of state power to subjugate, destroy the life of, or kill millions (as is the logical conclusion of the logistics of finding and deporting millions) of people in nationalist "cleansings" and "purification" against minority groups. He's obsessed with breeding and perpetuates "great replacement" conspiracies. He supports the AfD. He hates and infantilises trans people (not exclusive to nazis but yaknow, they were big on that shit to the point of mass slaughter of us).

Here is a salute comparison. Do not gaslight yourself or the rest of us: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pICDVb3jztA

I just wish we'd get solid, affordable RISC-V already. Especially with the arbitrary-length vector instruction extension, which I find to be a much better design for hardware compatibility than the fixed width extensions in x86 (and ARM too, AFAIK).

[–] sapient_cogbag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The catholic church still considers being trans a sin (and hence inferior to being cis).

I wish people would stop whitewashing that organisation, even if this is a tiny amount of progress (no shade on the op, just a general comment on the way conversations around organised religion and the catholic church in general seem to be happening >.<)

[–] sapient_cogbag@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

ITT: people advocating eugenics on themselves. I hate it. I hate seeing it. And stuff like this is psychologically destructive to read for me.

If people here don't like others with similar traits to them advocating that their life and perspective is not valuable and that they should hate it and wish no-one new experience it, I recommend avoiding this thread - even moreso if you have suicidal tendencies. It was very upsetting for me ;-;, even though I personally have no intent to have kids.

I guess it's a typo for "baby trans", a sometimes-slightly-derogatory term (but can be neutral too) for people who only recently started transitioning or only recently realised they are trans ^.^

Some people who've been transitioning for longer don't find the kind of stuff they feel is often posted by """baby trans""" people interesting or enjoyable or relatable. Or they just aren't into online trans meme cultures, or several other things.

 

Seems like TWIN's site (https://this-week-in-neovim.org/) is down - the dns doesn't resolve.

IIRC the author was moving away from neovim and was having some maintainence issues, but I'm curious if anyone else has more info ^.^?

I think folks would like some actual evidence before bandwagoning.

Though good on you for starting your own instance ^.^

[–] sapient_cogbag@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 years ago

That's gotta be what, 4 hours from discovery to patch?

Impressive work from everyone nya :)

I love FOSS

I see this as an absolute win!

 

There has recently been a lot of debate on defederation as a tool. In particular, around exploding-heads and lemmygrad. I am somewhat in favour, but I do understand the concerns of fragmentation (I'm not going to entertain the "free speech" people).

I think most people on here - or at least the active commenters, which is a biased sample - don't like the general type of content on those instances and the communities they generate. This means, for instance, most of us probably don't want them appearing in the local and federated feeds.

However, the proposal for users to have to manually block those instances isn't really enough, because it means we all have to do this manually even if most of the instance doesn't want to propagate and elevate the content from these other instances.

What I think would be best is if/when Lemmy improves moderation tools ^.^. In particular, I'd suggest that we should push lemmy or actively develop into lemmy (its open source after all) some way to stop either specific communities or posts from entire instances from appearing in the main feeds, while they are still accessible if specifically linked to or searched for - "silencing". One step above per-user blocking of instances, but still below defederation.

We could also say "members from this instance can comment but not post" or other things to reduce the risk of hostile brigading and organising on this instance while not directly hindering interoperability ^.^

Aye, as long as there's an easy way to unblock.

view more: next ›