I don't understand the perspective that people should be more lazy. When people have lazy coworkers, they tend to suffer since they have to go above and beyond to get a task done. It's like having a group project in school, and there's the one guy that just does the bare minimum, so you have to work twice as hard so your grade doesn't go down.
And if everyone simultaneously became lazy, that would be a disaster too. You don't want hospitals or firefighters to suddenly decide they want to just run down the clock instead of doing the best job they can.
If you look at it only through the perspective of the morality of labor, it makes sense to say the rich are lazy and so it's fair for the poor to be equally lazy, but when you look at the larger picture, it's a lot less cut and dry.
The truth is, our current standard of living is based on the amount of work people do. If everyone suddenly became less productive, we would enter a recession or an economic depression.
After reading a lot of comments in this thread, I'm not sure I know what spaghetti code is. I thought spaghetti code was when the order of execution was obfuscated due to excessive jumps and GOTOs. But a lot of people are citing languages without those as examples of spaghetti code. Is this just a classic "I don't like this programming language, and I don't know much about it." Or is there something I'm missing?