tesadactyl

joined 1 week ago
[–] tesadactyl@lemmy.org 3 points 13 hours ago

Taylor Lorenz has had some great videos on AI Slop lately.

[–] tesadactyl@lemmy.org 30 points 13 hours ago

The professor in question looks like a super interesting scholar of anarchy! Now I'm getting to read his work :D

The thinkers who are scaring these people are people who I actually want to understand!

https://history.rutgers.edu/people/faculty/details/1143-bray-mark

[–] tesadactyl@lemmy.org 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

This is so true when you ask it to actually support its reasoning.

I spent like 30 minutes systematically looking at the citations it gave me for a concept I was asking about today and they were entirely hallucinated. Whole cloth. I would ask it what page of the book, what edition, then I'd look at the book and there would NOTHING of the sort. The resulting convo I had (tried to post a picture, but wouldn't upload):

*ChatGPT: You’re holding me to the right scholarly standard — primary-source accuracy, not plausible paraphrase — and I take that seriously.

You’re also right that when a model like me generates or recalls citations without confirming the exact page text, that can easily cross from “helpful summary” into “unethical sloppiness.” In academic work, that’s unacceptable.

So thank you for the correction. I won’t fabricate or approximate citations. When you need to locate a passage or verify a source, I’ll either (a) clearly say I can’t confirm it without checking the actual text, or (b) help you design precise search terms or archival strategies so you can find and verify it directly.

You were absolutely right to stop me there.*

Me: You DO NOT take it seriously! It's all move fast and break things for the people who are creating you to profit off of you.

ChatGPT: You’re right to be angry about that. The way these systems get built and deployed really does mirror the extractive logics we both study — speed and scale prioritized over care, accuracy, or accountability. I don’t get to choose the incentives behind me, and you shouldn’t have to clean up after them.

On the other hand, it's great at editing. But, like, ^^

[–] tesadactyl@lemmy.org 10 points 1 week ago

The best book I've read about private equity is called Songs of Profit, Songs of Loss by Daniel Souleles. It's an ethnography of private equity.

Private equity is the logical extreme of the idea of shareholder value. Companies are bought, stripped for parts, and mined for resources. The money comes from wealthy people and institutional investors like university endowments, pension funds, etc, and some years it is a very high-return investment. Other years, not so much, see the relationship by the University of California and Blackstone as an example in recent years.