thethirdgracchi

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 35 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The Guest by Hwang Sok-yong (who participated in the Gwangju uprising!) is another great historical fiction novel, this one about right-wing massacres in North Korea during the Korean War by Koreans from the South and anti-communist Christian Koreans in the North. Interesting Hwang Sok-yong's books are published in both the north and the south, except for some in the south which have been banned. Hwang Sok-yong was imprisoned for some years in South Korea for "breaching the National Security Law" by visiting the north on a book tour.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

Hey, it's not dumb to not know things!! It's only dumb to not learn things when given the chance. You don't have to apologise for not knowing something, especially given your question wasn't dumb. In fact it's exactly right; I'd argue that most societies operated under what they did not consider was a religion and has later been understood in a Western anthropological context as a "religion." I fact, having a religion that consists of a holy book, laws, belief, prophets, etc is the weird outlier, as for the overwhelming plurality of human history nobody had that.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Mashallah, hopefully all the "reformist/neoliberal" hand wringing on here about Pezeshkian turns out to be for naught.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Balagangadhara argues that as a conceptual category "religion" as understood by the West does not and cannot apply to traditions outside of the West. Even for the pagan Romans and Greeks "religion" just meant "performing the rites of my ancestors." There were atheists that professed "religion," because "religion" was not belief or doctrine or whatever, it was practice and tradition. Christians in the Roman Empire were critiqued as "having no religion" because they weren't practicing the rites of their ancestors, they had nothing connecting them to their past. So Christians kind of turned the turn around, and instead redefined "religion" to mean faith and belief in a coherent set of ideology and doctrine, often submitting to a central authority that determines this doctrine, and from a holy book. This idea of "religion" maps very well onto Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. But other cultures it is nonsensical. Asking somebody from ancient India "do you believe in Krishna" makes no sense. The terms of the question are irrelevant. There's no "belief system," there's no "holy book" or "faith" or "doctrine" or whatever. It's not a question of faith or belief at all. Hinduism as a term didn't even exist until the 19th century, and it was invented by Western scholars attempting to make sense of Indian thought. Similarly, Chinese thought also has no sense of "religion" in any sense that Westerners can make sense of, and to apply the term to existing social and cultural practices elsewhere attempts to pigeonhole entirely different systems of thought into a colonial framework.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Well considering the concept of "religion" is a thoroughly Western idea and has no equivalent in most other ancient cultures (see "The Heathen in his Blindness...": Asia, the West and the Dynamic of Religion by S. N. Balagangadhara) I would say almost all of them. "Hinduism," to just cite one example, is a constructed "religion" that did not understand itself as thus and arguably didn't even exist until Westerners constructed it.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sending troops to Ukraine would make us belligerents. War against Russia would be madness. This belligerent verbal escalation by a nuclear power against another major nuclear power is already an irresponsible act. Parliament must be seized and say no. No war! It is high time to negotiate peace in Ukraine with mutual security clauses!

He also wants France to leave NATO.

Per his Twitter here: https://x.com/JLMelenchon/status/1762251673320259837

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Some Jews feel threatened by the presence of Islamists in France, who carried out several terror attacks last year, as well as by a sharp rise in antisemitic incidents.

That has led some to consider a vote for the far right — a move once seen as unthinkable, given that the party co-founder Jean-Marie Le Pen described the Nazi gas chambers as a “detail of history”.

Serge Klarsfeld, a French Holocaust survivor and famed Nazi hunter, shocked many by saying last month he would vote for the RN if they were in run-offs with LFI candidates.

"I would not hesitate, I would vote for the RN . . . I am faced with a far left in thrall to La France Insoumise and its stench of antisemitism and a violent anti-Zionism, and the RN that has evolved,” he said.

Imagine being a Holocaust survivor and voting for fascists. Insanity in France. Note the LFI is France Unbowed, Mélenchon's left party and the largest member of the NFP, the left alliance. From here: https://www.ft.com/content/55740b08-dd73-4ac5-a8be-9a20b5dfeb56

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 23 points 10 months ago

Also I'm continuing my campaign of reading as little about TERF island as possible. The FT this weekend has a whole feature on the election that I refuse to engage with outside of the Scottish and Irish bits. I always skip the UK section on the Economist. I do not care about England, it does not matter on the global stage in any serious sense, and I hate that Anglophone media devotes so much time to a deranged backwater. england-cool

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 58 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Sinn Féin actually increased its vote share in Northern Ireland, and Paisley lost his DUP seat. Meanwhile in France, looks like the RN isn't going to get a majority after all. The left and the centre's strategy of dropping candidates to consolidate the anti-fascist vote is working. We're on track for a hung parliament with the left alliance in a solid second place, per here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-05/le-pen-projected-to-win-175-205-seats-in-french-vote-ipsos-says

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Sinn Féin actually increased its vote share in Northern Ireland, and Paisley lost his DUP seat. Meanwhile in France, looks like the RN isn't going to get a majority after all. The left and the centre's strategy of dropping candidates to consolidate the anti-fascist vote is working. We're on track for a hung parliament with the left alliance in a solid second place, per here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-05/le-pen-projected-to-win-175-205-seats-in-french-vote-ipsos-says

EDIT: Fuck wrong mega, knew I fucked up when the comment I saw next to mine was about fluffy pillow, which I btw totally agree. Fluffy pillows are a plot against the working class, the simulation of luxury whilst actively hurting you.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cowards! Backstabbers! Ingrates! Traitors! Snakes! Biden’s performance at that debate was magnificent. No one is better placed or richlier qualified to lead his county through the rest of this decade. Before the debate I still wasn’t sure, but now I’m absolutely committed; I’m ridin’ with Biden, even if I know exactly where this road leads. Make him president for life! It could be longer than you think. Hook him up to machines, flood his veins with crank. Long live Joe! Long live the king!

This is your heritage as an American. So yes, fine: your democratic process has been reduced to an Old Man Contest, two leathery codgers competing over who has more of his brain still functioning. Odds are pretty good that both candidates were wearing some kind of adult incontinence nappy for the debate. A good night for either of them meant not visibly drooling or falling over on stage. So what? This upsets you? You think your country ought to be better than this? Are you really worried about Joe Biden? Joe Biden is still alive! He talks! You can ask him what day of the week it is, and he’ll answer you! The answer might even be accurate! What are you complaining about? For thousands of years, your continent was ruled by the silent mountains and the blood-hungry sun, and they spoke a language only measurable in graves. Next to them, Joe Biden is a model of lucidity.

What the backstabbers don’t understand is that Joe Biden is president for a reason. You will not unseat him, because he is the man for his age. Napoleon might have been the world-spirit on horseback, but the world-spirit no longer needs horses. Joe Biden is the world-spirit dribbling ice cream down its chin.

From King Joe Forever

 

It's time to continue our Memes with Citations series with my favorite work by everybody's poster child of postmodern literary theory, Jacques Derrida. His entire shtick, in a nutshell, is a continuation of Marxist materialism into the literary sphere that he called "deconstruction." Truth, justice, fact? All hogwash—all that exists is the sign, and signs derive meaning via contrast with other signs. "There is no outside-text," and all meaning must exist in conversation with everything else. This is all great and fun, but we're here to talk about his "political turn" in the 90's, and specifically his Spectres of Marx.

He wrote the book in 1993, after the collapse of actually existing communism with the left in total disarray. It was the "end of history" as Fukuyama declared, and neoliberalism was the "one true" system left. Not so fast, wrote Derrida. As he explains (and this is the meme):

Capitalist societies can always heave a sigh of relief and say to themselves: communism is finished since the collapse of the totalitarianism of the twentieth century and not only is it finished, but it did not take place, it was only a ghost. They do no more than disavow the undeniable itself: a ghost never dies, it remains always to come and to come-back.

Through this comment, the study of hauntology was born. A ghost from the past, haunting the present with a promised future that never came. It's been applied to all sorts of things, from music (see Mark Fisher's Ghosts of My Life) to climate change (by yours truly), but the kernel of the study is that Marxism will forever haunt the West, for it can never be truly killed.

The gall that Derrida has to write this book is amazing, for it seemed all was lost for the worldwide left. Destroyed in Europe, in retreat everywhere else, it was truly the end times. And here was this literary theorist, the boogeyman of the culture wars of the 80's and 90's, writing about how communism can never truly be killed.

Want to also share the following passage, which I think is the best arguement against capitalism in the modern era ever formulated. For every chud that screams at you that "poverty has never been lower," just tell them something like the following:

For it must be cried out, at a time when some have the audacity to neo-evangelise in the name of the ideal of a liberal democracy that has finally realised itself as the ideal of human history: never have violence, inequality, exclusion, famine, and thus economic oppression affected as many human beings in the history of the earth and of humanity. Instead of singing the advent of the ideal of liberal democracy and of the capitalist market in the euphoria of the end of history, instead of celebrating the ‘end of ideologies’ and the end of the great emancipatory discourses, let us never neglect this obvious macroscopic fact, made up of innumerable singular sites of suffering: no degree of progress allows one to ignore that never before, in absolute figures, have so many men, women and children been subjugated, starved or exterminated on the earth.

view more: next ›