tinsuke

joined 2 years ago
[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Caco (Brazil)

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I bet they were feeling much more whee than whoo that night.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh no!

Do I need to have 12 coasters? Well, no. But I didn't need the 8 ones I already have either, and Steve keeps pumping out bangers like this, so...

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago

Reminded me of this little fella:

Der kleine Maulwurf

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Dude publishing the most vaporware scam looking game pitch since The Day Before: publishing other people's games is the problem.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 69 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Standing legs? Man stands on his own 2. King sits on the 4 of his throne. Beggar sits on the floor?

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Sir/madam/gentleperson, I commend your humbleness and civic posture in this conversation.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Holy crap! It's as if I had access to this blog post beforehand!

Joke aside, it is still a "trust me bro, we don't keep your clear text history" security model. AKA no guaranteed privacy.

https://proton.me/blog/lumo-security-model

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 60 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Love how it highlights that big tech (much to capitalism's fault, TBH) can only drive innovation if the tech has a moat around it, if no one else can, or would, copy it and deploy it at a lower cost.

Which is... the argument that people use to defend capitalism? That capitalism drives innovation and makes it accessible to everyone at the lowest possible price.

I like the frugal tech idea as much as I like degrowth.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

From their own response (and due to logical thinking about how the LLM service works): https://fosstodon.org/@notesnook/114927444378333659

Strictly speaking, if you consider Lumo's GPU servers to be one of the "ends", then yeah, it is E2EE (you and the server being the ends).

But Proton own the GPU servers, and therefore have access to their private keys, so they can decrypt your messages as they arrive, before they're deleted, which happens after they're encrypted with your asymetric key (so only you can read it) and stored with zero-access.

I don't consider this safe. In a system where you are only interfacing with a computer (and not other users), E2EE should mean that only you have access to the unencrypted data, at any given time. Which is how Proton Drive works.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Stated can be a long way away from reality. That website statement can be changed at a whim and doesn't have any legal binding.

If you wanna rely on encryption to protect your privacy, you have to be encrypted/protected from the service provider too, that's what E2EE is all about, and what many of Proton's services provide, but Lumo not.

 

Just a guide on how I got MariaDB working instead of SQLite for my PhotoPrism instance running on a FreeBSD jail.

 

Technological feat aside:

Revolutionary heat dissipating coating effectively reduces temperatures by more than 10%

78.5C -> 70C = (78.5 - 70) / 78.5 = 0.1082 = 10% right?!

Well, not really. Celsius is an arbitrary temperature scale. The same values on Kelvin would be:

351.65K -> 343.15K = (351.65 - 343.15) / 351.65 = 0.0241 = 2% (???)

So that's why you shouldn't do % on temp changes. A more entertaining version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhkYcO1VxOk&t=374s

view more: next ›