wolfyvegan

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
 
  • Environmental impact assessments for development projects in Amazon countries have evolved from highly biased, centralized procedures to more rigorous processes that aim to avoid conflicts of interest.
  • EIAs have also become increasingly focused on the social impacts of development and on how to mitigate them or compensate affected communities.
  • Large-scale development projects are generally reviewed by national-level entities while less controversial initiatives can be attributed to regional governments.
 
  • Environmental impact assessments for development projects in Amazon countries have evolved from highly biased, centralized procedures to more rigorous processes that aim to avoid conflicts of interest.
  • EIAs have also become increasingly focused on the social impacts of development and on how to mitigate them or compensate affected communities.
  • Large-scale development projects are generally reviewed by national-level entities while less controversial initiatives can be attributed to regional governments.
 
  • Scientists from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute are collaborating with local communities in the Ngäbe-Buglé Comarca, a protected Indigenous territory, to foster a ground-up reforestation strategy using native trees and carbon payments.
  • The project involves about 30 plots totaling 100 hectares (247 acres) of land, giving participants full ownership of their trees.
  • The approach is based on carbon-sequestration data and other scientific metrics collected from Smithsonian’s Agua Salud research site in Colón.
  • The work also leans on economic analyses to ensure that reforestation projects can become reliable and sustainable livelihood strategies for Panama’s rural communities.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 
  • Scientists from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute are collaborating with local communities in the Ngäbe-Buglé Comarca, a protected Indigenous territory, to foster a ground-up reforestation strategy using native trees and carbon payments.
  • The project involves about 30 plots totaling 100 hectares (247 acres) of land, giving participants full ownership of their trees.
  • The approach is based on carbon-sequestration data and other scientific metrics collected from Smithsonian’s Agua Salud research site in Colón.
  • The work also leans on economic analyses to ensure that reforestation projects can become reliable and sustainable livelihood strategies for Panama’s rural communities.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 
  • Scientists from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute are collaborating with local communities in the Ngäbe-Buglé Comarca, a protected Indigenous territory, to foster a ground-up reforestation strategy using native trees and carbon payments.
  • The project involves about 30 plots totaling 100 hectares (247 acres) of land, giving participants full ownership of their trees.
  • The approach is based on carbon-sequestration data and other scientific metrics collected from Smithsonian’s Agua Salud research site in Colón.
  • The work also leans on economic analyses to ensure that reforestation projects can become reliable and sustainable livelihood strategies for Panama’s rural communities.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 
  • A new analysis of more than 70,000 wild animal species reveals that climate change is now the third-greatest threat to the planet’s wildlife, following overexploitation and habitat degradation.
  • The study found that nearly 5% of the assessed species are threatened by climate change, with ocean invertebrates being particularly vulnerable to climate change-related threats, such as extreme temperatures, floods, droughts, storms and ocean acidification.
  • The study warns that some animal populations, both on land and at sea, have already begun to collapse due to climate change-related events, and it’s now necessary to monitor mass die-offs to understand the impacts of climate change and predict future impacts.

archived (Wayback Machine)

Important Correction

“Fossil fuels are the main driver of the climate crisis,” Wolf said. “Rapidly phasing out fossil fuels is essential if we’re going to prevent mass extinctions of animals and plants and maintain healthy wildlife populations and ecosystems with all the benefits they provide.”

This is dangerously incorrect. To "rapidly" phase out fossil fuels and not address the other factors contributing to the climate crisis would be suicidal for life on Earth.

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

In a remote corner of North America, salmon and mining companies are vying for new territory.

The Tulsequah Glacier meanders down a broad valley in northwest British Columbia, 7 miles from the Alaska border. At the foot of the glacier sits a silty, gray lake, a reservoir of glacial runoff. The lake is vast, deeper than Seattle’s Space Needle is tall. But it didn’t exist a few decades ago, before 2 miles of ice had melted.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

In a remote corner of North America, salmon and mining companies are vying for new territory.

The Tulsequah Glacier meanders down a broad valley in northwest British Columbia, 7 miles from the Alaska border. At the foot of the glacier sits a silty, gray lake, a reservoir of glacial runoff. The lake is vast, deeper than Seattle’s Space Needle is tall. But it didn’t exist a few decades ago, before 2 miles of ice had melted.

archived (Wayback Machine)

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

If you have to cook it, I would question whether it is food, but at least you got some use out of all of that fruit.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 hours ago

Or if you're a programmer, submit patches that provide the energy-conserving features or improve efficiency generally. Use free software.

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago

Experiences like that are worth remembering. :)

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That is awesome. That's like North America's version of durian. One more reason to save the forest.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago

Never heard of those dogwood fruits, but sounds like something that I would eat if I ever found it growing. Cool that you were able to educate those folks!

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago

...You have seen some things that I'd never even heard of.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That's the way. Grow so much fruit that the neighbours can have as much as they want. Were the avocados any good on their own?

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 hours ago

That's some good old-fashioned fun! I once saw a LOADED engkala tree with a bullet ant nest at the base of it, and I just walked away.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago

Buy electric

Or if possible, don't buy at all.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This will probably be less destructive than a road or a mining project, but if this increases trade with China, then it increases the profit incentive for production of all of those deforestation-linked commodities that are produced in the Amazon and Cerrado biomes, and possibly in the Atlantic Forest as well. The main problem is therefore not the destruction caused by the railway itself but by the production of the things that it transports.

Another (potential) problem with this railway is that it creates a new profit incentive for deforestation. If speculators buy land in key locations along the railway and deforest it in anticipation of the demand for a settlement or trading hub, the damage is done, even if nothing is ever built there. Better than the semi-permanent destruction of having a town or road or mining project or cow pasture there, and maybe it won't happen at all, but it still isn't exactly good news. If the railway were replacing a road network which would be closed off and allowed to reforest itself, then that would be progress.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anyone know if Sarawak is still relatively LGBTQ-friendly?

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A) As the previous commenter said, if you buy ETF shares from someone who is selling them, you are not financially supporting the corporation. Only buying their IPO would do that. These corporations will succeed or fail, do evil shit or do not-so-evil shit, based on supply and demand (and subsidies, and lobbying...), not based on whether you personally own shares in them.

B) You can't predict the future. Common sense says that equities' historical growth cannot continue forever. It's up to you to decide whether the risk of equity investing makes sense for your personal situation and investment time horizon. Diversifying your investments across asset classes (equities, bonds, precious metals, CDs, fruit trees, real estate...) is probably the most assured way to reduce volatility, and it may or may not result in higher risk-adjusted returns, but this probably won't translate to higher gross returns compared to investing in equities alone (unless the stock market crashes while you are still invested and never recovers).

Probably the strongest case for investing in equities would be: If you expect the next stock market crash to be accompanied by the end of the monetary system as we know it, then any cash that you currently have lying around will become worthless at that point whether you invest it in equities or not. (So you might as well invest it and make some money while you can.)

Probably the strongest case for NOT investing in equities would be the facts that the growth in equities cannot continue indefinitely and that investing any extra money in tangible assets (e.g. land to grow your own food, solar panels and batteries, or other infrastructure that contributes to your independence from the system while reducing your ongoing expenses) is of real benefit to you regardless of what the stock market does.

Source: I grow fruit trees. You'd be surprised at how many parallels there are to financial investments. (Pro tip: the risk-free rate of return is the banana yield that a given area of land could produce.)

view more: next ›