this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
706 points (86.5% liked)

Political Humor

1279 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PatrickYaa@lemmy.one 79 points 8 months ago (17 children)

I have the feeling that since the vote is over, a lot fewer people are here to defend their "ron't vote for harris because palestine" stance. Like something was switched off...

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 51 points 8 months ago (13 children)

I notice that some of them have pivoted to “this was completely the fault of the Democrats, the voters are blameless” messaging, which this would fall under.

Messages of urgent concern about what we need to do for the Palestinians have completely evaporated though, yes. It turns out that it began and ended with not voting for the Democrats, and now there’s nothing particular they want to say about Palestine. Good thing that was all we needed to do, huh? We really squeaked one out there, I guess, with our victory.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I remember in the weeks following the announcement that Biden would step down and endorse Harris people dug into her voting record and revealed that she was one of the furthest left-leaning members of the Senate, up there with Sanders and Warren.

Now that she's lost the election all of a sudden so-called "progressives" are claiming she lost because she was basically a Republican.

The GOP's strategy was clearly to promote voter apathy and drive down turnout for people more likely to vote Harris, and it worked. Trump finally won the popular vote- and he did so with about 6 million fewer votes than what Biden got in 2020.

Far too many progressive, and maybe even moderate Dems and independents, really believed all the nonsense. "Both sides are the same", "you're vote doesn't matter", "there's no way Trump can win", "Bidenomics is totally what caused the global inflation and we are just going to ignore that post-pandemic inflation in the US was the lowest of any developed economy", "she's a cop", etc. Heck, maybe there is even some misogynist or racism on the left that may have hurt Harris. And now instead of just trying to dig out way out of decades of neoliberalism we're just escalating to fascism.

I blame everyone. The GOP and Trump of course. The billionaires (the loud ones like Musk and Bezos, but also the quieter ones like Thiel and the Walton family). Russia of course. The spineless politicians and government officials who refused to put Trump behind bars. The DNC for the shenanigans they've been pulling with primaries for the past several elections and for planning to run a walking corpse in 2024 instead of setting up a real successor to Biden. All of the people who voted for Trump and the other Republicans. All of the left-leaning folk who didn't turn out for Harris. The decades of the GOP undermining democracy (really starting with pardoning Nixon, the whole Regan administration, the hanging chads in 2000, Mitch McConnell taking over the courts, etc).

The only comfort I have is that I know I did my part and voted.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago (19 children)

She was one of the furthest left Senators. Then she ran to the right as hard as possible during her short campaign. She took progressives and leftists for granted and lost.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The truth was never part of the issue. They often had contradictory messaging depending on the audience.

  • Kamala betrayed Israel because she's sympathetic to Palestinian terrorists / Kamala loves genocide
  • Kamala's a communist / all the Democrats are corrupt and in bed with the corporations
  • Kamala is for open borders and evil immigrants / Kamala is crueler than Trump on immigration

Most of it was actually engineered for Biden and based on what he did in office, to the extent that it was even based on anything, and then they just did a search-and-replace to change it to Kamala. It makes no sense, but the effectiveness is not really based on it making sense, just on insistent constant repetition and on it lining up with the reader's general vulnerabilities in terms of what tends to resonate with them. Lemmy gets the second half of each of my examples, but the first half also got plenty of play and had plenty of effectiveness with other audiences.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I did see recently some ads from right-wing PAC's that were shown in different swing states- some portraying Harris as an enemy of Israel in predominantly Jewish areas (I know Judaism =/= Zionism but if you were trying to direct ads to Zionists that's probably the closest you can get) and others portraying Harris as a genocidal supporter of Israel in areas with higher Palestinian populations.

Something that always surprises me is just how effective such dumb advertising is to the average person. I'm not even claiming to be some superhuman immune to propaganda, but political ads always seem particularly low-effort yet seem to control the outcomes of elections.

She leaned hard into preserving the moderate/conservative vote. There is no denieing it.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

No. I don't know why you aren't seeing them but they are very much still there. This is just yet another effort to blame the people instead of the party that couldn't get people to vote for it. Which is their entire job.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah I don’t know what these knobs are talking about, I still see lots of people talking about Palestine and the genocide and the democrats complicity. Libs are just making shit up now.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Wasn't it something like 11% of Democratic primary voters that checked the box for "uncommitted" to signify that they weren't willing to vote for genocide? (Might have been 11% in one state, I'm not sure, but the 'uncommiteds' were a big enough number for MSM reporting.)

Seems to me like Dems had plenty of time and motivation to change their political stance on the issue.

[–] NaibofTabr 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Like something was switched off...

funding from the Kremlin

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I suddenly stopped seeing a bunch of posters I had tagged as a "Russian Asset". I'm sure it's because I blocked some of them, but the fact that I don't have any false positives left to plague me tells me a lot.

[–] simplymath@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (6 children)

lol. do you honestly think there are psyop campaigns on Lemmy? for all 12 of us? lololol. I thought I was paranoid, but goddamn.

Do you know how much it costs to run a chat bot?

[–] lurklurk@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

What, you don't think Russia can afford it?

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (14 children)

Do you know how much it costs to start a war? Do you think russia is a fiscally responsible terrorist organisation?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

There are still a couple running around, mostly with day old accounts. They claim they're being banned for holding that stance but from what I've seen they're getting banned for being inflammatory dickholes.

load more comments (13 replies)