this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
693 points (98.1% liked)

me_irl

6426 readers
746 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 67 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Real talk the lack of caller id for all businesses or government lines is insane.

If you are not making a private call, on a private line, the I'd should be populated

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The bigger issue here is spam calls.

If that shit was stopped, people wouldn't ignore unknown callers.

While your solution is good it only solves part of the problem.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

No, if a company was calling me and I didn't want to talk to them, I'd still be better informed with caller id.

A spam call would be ignored because I wouldn't recognize the business name

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Many countries have this. It’s just just shitty American carriers that hold us back by gating anything and everything behind a fee.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Actually, in this case, it's partially the opposite.

The Madison River Telephone Company (later CenturyLink and now Lumen) started blocked calls and services from Vonage (VOIP) in 2005 because VOIP was a threat. The FCC stepped in and ruled against Madison River in what was really the beginning of Net Neutrality legislation.

Their ruling established that phone carriers couldn't discriminate against other services accessing their network and its features. Among those features is Caller ID. Since any. VOIP phone system doesn't actually originate from a telephone exchange, so they all essentially have to "spoof" their Caller ID.

The phone companies can't block CallerID spoofing from spamme4s and scammers without violating a 20yo ruling from the FCC.