this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
1105 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck AI

4308 readers
653 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Via Xcancel)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

As long as progress continues and humanity survives, computer generated art will eventually outperform humans. It's pretty obvious, as far as science knows you could just simulate a full human consciousness and pull images out of that somehow, but able to run that in parallel, never deteriorating, never tiring. It's not a matter of if "AI" can outperform humans, it's a matter of if humanity will survive to see that and how long it might take.

[–] Natanael 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

No, because the best art isn't measured in skill, but in relevance to lived experiences

Until you can upload a bunch of brains and simulate them in full you can't capture that experience accurately, and you'll still have a hard time keeping it up to date

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

No, he's got a point. AI already scores, on average, at least 8.7 kilo-arts on the quantitative art scale we all use already (and have, ever since the Renaissance gave us all that pesky realism), and line always go up, as we know.

Not sure if I need the /s but here it is.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Explain art performance, chief.