this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
171 points (97.8% liked)
Casual Conversation
3363 readers
338 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible.
- Avoid controversial topics (e.g. politics or societal debates).
- Stay calm: Don’t post angry or to vent or complain. We are a place where everyone can forget about their everyday or not so everyday worries for a moment. Venting, complaining, or posting from a place of anger or resentment doesn't fit the atmosphere we try to foster at all. Feel free to post those on !goodoffmychest@lemmy.world
- Keep it clean and SFW
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I said want, not provoke. Getting caught actively provoking war would instantly end a corporation in many jurisdictions. I have no proof of them doing that, but I also wouldn't be surprised if some do. SAAB? Probably not. American ones at least can easily affect policy by financing politicians, particularly presidents.
So you're just discussing in bad faith here. How the hell do you know the CEO (or the management) "wants" war but does not want to "provoke war"? Are you a mind reader?
Or are you one of those people thinking we shouldn't have an army?
I also notice the "USA BAD" bias, what about russia, they do want war and provoke it.
Mate I'm Estonian, Russia is bad by default, it doesn't even need discussion. You don't think Russian military industry CEOs and owners didn't cream their pants when Putin invaded Ukraine again? Chemezov is super happy about it for one, he's also very happy that western companies are no longer competing with him on the Russian market.
The CEOs of military industrial companies, like any other CEOs, are going to make more money if the company's numbers are better. If a war happening in bumfuck nowhere doubles the Christmas bonus of one of those bloodsuckers, you bet they'll cheer for it. It's not like war affects them personally. And it's hella fucking profitable.
I'm not anti military spending, I'm anti capitalists profiting from bloodshed. Military industry shouldn't be profitable. It should be nationalised.
I'm swedish so I know the history.
I just hate this stupid fearmongering about military spending. We should spend more nowadays, so this whole narrative that some hidden kabal is provoking wars is just bad for everyone IMO. And yes it's disgusting that CEOs gets bonuses because they sell more weapons, but we want them to make them so that we can buy them, it's IMO not the other way around.
It's absolutely what putin would love BTW, "lets shut down those war hawks' businesses!" narrative.
But I think you and I might be on the same side when it comes down to it, or so I feel.
Cheers and fuck russia
I'm not against either of our countries increasing military spending either, I'm just disgusted that a bunch of people are getting rich off people dying. Hence my idea that weapons manufacturing should be a public industry, not a for-profit one. European nations could still collaborate too. Not everyone needs to make everything.