this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
212 points (94.9% liked)

politics

23672 readers
2826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Time for a Labor Party in America.

[–] justineie_bobeanie@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Now is the time for world socialist revolution. The time for a Labor Party was 60 years ago. Instead, the leadership of the trade union movement subordinated itself to the Democratic Party and imperialism. This process has been replicated worldwide in the various Social Democratic and Labor parties in support of capitalist exploitation and imperialist war. The entire system is in a state of advanced decay and historical bankruptcy with no possibility of meaningful reform.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can't use the word socialism, the well has been thoroughly poisoned as a buzzword

[–] justineie_bobeanie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hard disagree. We must use the terms "socialism" (and "communism") openly and directly.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Go for it, dig your heels in.

It's a needless uphill battle, we're trying to get people on our side who will never understand what socialism is.

They only "know" that it's bad.

They have no idea what it is, only that they've been told ad nauseum that it's bad.

It's a losing battle with ignorant people, better off just going at it with fresh nomenclature to make any kind of progress on it

We can try to educate these people until we're blue in the face and will not change anything

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm with you. Too much baggage with these terms. I'd rather extract the actual policies from them and run with those directly. Call it "supercapitalism" for all I care (although realistically I think "demsoc" would sound like an intuitive next step after "socdem").

I also agree with the previous person that it's a time for revolutionary change. It's clear the current system needs to fundamentally transform to be stable, either by doubling down on capitalism at the expense of democracy, or by doubling down on democracy at the expense of capitalism. It's clear now that the two cannot coexist.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's definitely prime time for revolutionary change

It's just a waste of time to use the buzzwords that have been poisoned beyond saving

Socialism is what is needed to balance the scales, only we can't call it that

The wealthy and powerful have gone to great lengths to ensure that word can never hold universal appeal

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Freedom fighters

[–] match@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we still generally need ground work and revolutionary momentum

This is correct. We are witnessing some of the greatest upsurge in working class militancy in several decades, as well as a veritable renaissance in revolutionary thought. The stuff of great historic movements is available in plenty abundance. It depends on what we do with this moment.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I keep writing my senators. One senator I voted for under the Working Families' Party (his name next to both WFP and Dem). The Second Senator is an old fart who I wanted to look up to, but continues to enable the R party as a Dem.

I write them often, and a few days ago, wrote the old fart to let him know his actions directly are why I just changed my voter registration to independent. Im no longer registered Democrat. I was there for Bernie, and nothing good has come of anything over my 10 years as a Dem. I write the WFP senator to remind him I voted for him under that party name.

Will it do anything? I don't know, but I hope everyone is writing thier senators and reps at least bi weekly. Its so easy to do today, you dont even need a stamp!