The Sugar diet is making the social media rounds.
This is a no fat, high carbohydrate diet.
Just like the rice diet : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_diet
The potato diet, and the McDougal diet, the fruitarian diet
From what I can tell the principal mechanism of action is avoiding Randle cycle cross inhibition (not a cycle) which avoids systemic inflammation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randle_cycle
In this video Jesus goes over the reported effects of the high carb no fat diets and plausible mechanical effects in the context of muscle gain.
summerizer
Why the Sugar Diet
Dr. Jesus Vega discusses the controversial Sugar Diet, exploring its potential benefits and drawbacks. He shares insights from Mark Bell's protocol, which restricts other food types while allowing fruits and sugars for a limited period each week. The conversation highlights how this diet aims to promote fat burning while minimizing muscle loss. Additionally, he cautions against relying solely on this diet for long-term health, noting possible negative effects on insulin sensitivity and metabolic health, as well as the need for balanced nutrition.
Key Points
Introduction to Sugar Diet
The Sugar Diet has gained popularity, with Mark Bell promoting a specific protocol. The discussion highlights that this diet includes consuming fruits, fruit juices, honey, and some candies over several days to push the metabolism into fat-burning.
Benefits of Sugar Diet
The Sugar Diet may help with weight loss without significant muscle loss. The diet aims to promote fat burning by limiting fat intake and allowing the body to use stored fat as energy, potentially making exercise easier during sugar fasting.
Difference from Other Diets
Unlike the Keto diet, which trains the body to burn dietary fat, the Sugar Diet relies on sugar and internal fat stores. This can lead to less muscle loss than traditional fasting, but there are potential long-term consequences.
Hormonal Effects
This diet could balance between fat-burning and muscle retention through hormonal influences, specifically increasing fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) but potentially decreasing insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), impacting muscle growth.
Caveats and Risks
Despite short-term benefits, the long-term sustainability and health impacts of the Sugar Diet are uncertain. Concerns include metabolic flexibility, insulin sensitivity, nutrient deficiencies, and the risk of developing unhealthy eating patterns.
Call for Research
The Sugar Diet lacks extensive scientific testing to support its claims. Dr. Vega emphasizes the need for more data on its long-term effects and the importance of not neglecting overall health in favor of short-term results.
@toomanypancakes@lemmy.world Quick question -
You didn't downvote the post itself, so you agree with the sugar diet?
But you downvoted my explanation of the mechanisms, so you don't think it works by inhibiting Randel cycle oxidative stress?
Usually you just downvote everything, i just want to see if there is some more nuance here.
I think your diet is nonsense and I blocked your community so I don't have to see it anymore. No worries, I won't downvote anymore.
Right, I agree the Sugar diet is nonsense, but the mechanics behind it are interesting thats why i made this post to talk about it.
I am not following the sugar diet.
When you say things like "the sugar diet works"... Well anyone with any knowledge is just going to be dismissive - because it doesn't "work" generally.
If the title was "the sugar diet works for X" that would be different.
Plus in that image, the sugar diet didn't make that guy look like that. His insane working out did, and he probably did a lot of that before going on some wacky "sugar diet".
A better title would help - something conveying there's surprising info to be found here, despite the idea being wacky.
Sure, I'll update the post title
When i first encountered the rice diet, I was very confused about how it worked at all in any of the studies to get any results. It didn't fit into my insulin centric view of T2D and hypertension. The Randel cycle inflammation aspect was eye opening to me as a possible mechanistic explanation of the "success" of these interventions.