this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
384 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

71716 readers
3343 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artifex@lemmy.zip 175 points 1 day ago (3 children)

On the one hand, I understand the inherent limitations of pseudonymous social media and why a corporation and even end users might benefit from authoritative user identification.

On the other hand, oh hell no.

[–] floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 141 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Exactly. Reddit isn’t my fucking bank. They don’t need to know who I am.

[–] cuteness@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago

They don’t even require an email when signing up. At the same time they speed run to biometrics.

What a shit show they’ve become.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Your bank doesn't even need to know who you are.

On a related note, Bank of America, if you're reading this, my name is floop @lemmy.dbzer0.com, and I would like to withdraw all the money from my account. Nonsequential bills please!

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 hours ago

The banks are legally required to know who you are. It’s part of AML and anti-terrorist financing laws

It’s called KYC or “know your customer”.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] MellowSnow@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 4 hours ago

I'm on to you Spartacus!

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Whatcha mean, they obviously need to count the wrinkles on your dirty balloon knot.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Wow who's your butthole guy?

Wtf is this sorcery your post says "1." but when I reply its "37."

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

huh... maybe because of the period and no space? Markdown thinks it's a list item?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, there's someone here who has (not even exaggerating) 15+ accounts that they just rotate thru.

It's a hassle to block them all because I still see new ones, but I'll take that over "proving myself" as a unique person with something like this.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I haven't seen like any hilariouschaos users in awhile

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I don't think psudonyms are an issue, but verifying that a user is an actual person vs an AI chatbot is absolutely something that every popular social media platform will need to tackle at some point.

[–] SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hmm funny how Sam Altman is one of the few people responsible for creating that problem and now he's selling the solution to it

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 18 points 1 day ago

It's actually low-key brilliant. Start a gold rush, when you realize the gold isn't actually there, pivot to selling shovels and keep hyping the gold rush. Fools and their money are soon parted, and there seem to be an endless supply of them.

[–] artifex@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

He’s a modern day arms dealer.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

The bot problem has been around since before Sam Altman was old enough to legally drink. For example in the early days the founders of Reddit were running bots to make the site look wayyy busier than it actually was in order to attract new users.

He's a convenient bogey-man, and a huge asshole, but he's the not the source of this problem.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 5 points 22 hours ago

Why? Internet rules from the days gone by - everyone is a liar. So it shouldn't matter.

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Will they though? Facebook has already created undisclosed bot accounts themselves before. A Platform where real users and such bots are indistinguishable (for the user) sounds like a social media corpos and authoritarian governments wet dream to me. Also reminds me of the attempts to disguise ads as natural content.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 23 hours ago

Sure but they only want the bots they approve of. That way they can charge for the privilege of allowing someone's preferred bots onto the platform.