this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
1430 points (99.8% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
7579 readers
769 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Its crazy how Pam Bondi the Attorney General says there was no epstein files client list when a few months ago she said on live tv that she was currently reviewing the epstein files client list
She tried to walk back the comments about the file being on her desk, except she made those comments multiple times on different shows. She promised results within days, then nothing. Suddenly there is no list, and right wing news shows are now even saying Epstein wasn’t a bad guy and was set up
Next itll be that there was no Epstein. He was made up by the Democrats who are secretly in cahoots with China or some shit
It will be technically correct. As in, no one has put all Epstein's client's names together in one group, so there has never been a (master) list.
We know that Prince Andrew is somewhere so there can't be zero clients.
There may never have been a full list, but there was a little black book from 2008 or so. It's a list of names and phone numbers. Donald Trump has four numbers listed.
The problem is, there were also arguably innocent people in that book as well. Epstein was a piece of shit, but he was a piece of shit who liked to give money to charity. He also liked to hang out with smart people, like actual scientists and such.
Just saying that by itself, the black book is fairly weak. Combined with other evidence, and it could be a client list.
Wait a second. You're saying this piece of evidence that would be the starting point to investigations of everyone on that list is weak?
And, that could very easily be combined with the videos, and only after substantiating evidence is found would anyone be charged with a crime.
That's how investigations normally work.
You take one piece of evidence, combine it with more evidence, and eventually you have a full case.
The Feds have the back book (and so does the internet, because it was leaked online). The feds also have a lot of video that I personally don't want to see, but it should be enough to connect at least a few names.
The fact that they refuse to connect any names means that Trump is in too many of those videos.
It's sketchy but also feasibly explained by incompetence. "Oh yeah I just started on that homework assignment last night" tier of bullshit.