this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
3 points (66.7% liked)

Friendly Carnivore

54 readers
21 users here now

Carnivore

The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet

Meat Heals.

We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.

Keep being AWESOME

We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type


Purpose

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
  6. No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.

Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods


Resource Post!- Papers - Books - Channels

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

Conclusion:

We confirm from the review of the literature on epidemiological data, meta-analysis, and clinical interventions where dietary cholesterol challenges were utilized that there is not a direct correlation between cholesterol intake and blood cholesterol. This lack of correlation is mainly due to the compensatory mechanisms exerted by the organism to manage excess dietary cholesterol, including decreases in cholesterol absorption and down-regulation of cholesterol synthesis. A great number of epidemiological studies and meta-analysis indicate that dietary cholesterol is not associated with CVD risk nor with elevated plasma cholesterol concentrations. Clinical interventions in the last 20 years demonstrate that challenges with dietary cholesterol do not increase the biomarkers associated with heart disease risk. Further, in the specific circumstances where eggs are the source of dietary cholesterol, an improvement in dyslipidemias is observed due to the formation of less atherogenic lipoproteins and changes in HDL associated with a more efficient reverse cholesterol transport. However, if the cholesterol sources are consumed with saturated and trans fats, as happens in the Western diet pattern, increases in plasma cholesterol may be observed. The most recent epidemiological data and clinical interventions for the most part continue to support the USDA 2015 dietary guidelines that removed the upper limit of dietary cholesterol.

The document reviews the relationship between dietary and blood cholesterol, highlighting that recent epidemiological studies and clinical interventions have found no direct correlation between the two. It notes that outdated dietary guidelines limited cholesterol intake to 300 mg/day, but newer research suggests that dietary cholesterol does not significantly impact blood cholesterol levels.

The review discusses how dietary cholesterol from eggs does not increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and may even have beneficial effects on plasma lipoprotein subfractions and HDL cholesterol. It also mentions that the body has mechanisms to manage excess dietary cholesterol, such as decreased absorption and down-regulation of cholesterol synthesis.

The document concludes that current evidence supports the removal of upper limits on dietary cholesterol, as recommended by the 2015 USDA dietary guidelines.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xep@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Epidemiology is difficult, and it's good to keep in mind that the conclusions we draw from counting things and finding correlations may be confounded by many variables.

Not in this review but it is perhaps worth mentioning that the only statistically significant finding in Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial was that women with a history of heart disease faced a 26% increased chance of complications such as heart attack on a low saturated fat diet:

The HR for the 3.4% of women with CVD at baseline was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.03-1.54).

Eggs aren't bad for you in terms of heart disease:

In this study, an increase of one egg per day was not associated with any CVD risk. In fact, in an updated meta-analysis that included multiple cohorts from the US, Europe, and Asia, moderate egg consumption was associated with no risk of developing CVD overall and lower risk in Asian populations

Substituting carbs with eggs for breakfast results in a lowering of blood cholesterol:

Substituting high carbohydrate breakfast with eggs resulted in a similar lowering in plasma LDL cholesterol compared to baseline in 30 subjects following a randomized crossover study in which each breakfast was followed for 4 weeks [45].

Dietary cholesterol increases the size of plasma cholesterol particles. Smaller cholesterol particles are correlated with atherogenic dyslipidemia.

Regarding lipoprotein metabolism, dietary cholesterol leads to the formation of the large LDL particles that are known to be less atherogenic [32] and reduces the concentration of small LDL

The body is able to regulate plasma cholesterol levels:

Therefore, the handling of dietary cholesterol by the body can be explained by decreased absorption and down-regulation of synthesis.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If having breakfast, substituting carbs with eggs results in a lowering of blood cholesterol:

This is rather surprising. I wonder if in that 4 week window people reduced their damaged LDL?

[–] xep@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I also wonder if the time matters when replacing the carbohydrates with eggs? I think our bodies respond differently to meals at different times of day. Is there only a clear benefit at breakfast-time?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think our bodies respond differently to meals at different times of day.

I'm not familiar with this theory. How would it work?

Let's say someone does one meal a day, would they have different benefits from eating when they wake up, noon, or when they go to sleep?

I could see digestion interfering with good quality sleep

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I try not to eat within a few hours of bed, heavy digestion messes with my sleep, though I have napped not long after eating I think that's different to deep sleep

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 3 days ago

I've noticed this too! Eating before sleeping makes for less restful sleep and bad dreams. It's not subtle, its very noticeable. I typically eat one meal around noon, not typically a issue.

[–] xep@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From what I've read part of it has to do with circadian rhythms.

High Caloric intake at breakfast vs. dinner differentially influences weight loss of overweight and obese women This study showed that the group eating breakfast showed greater weight loss and waist circumference reduction.

As I understand it hormone secretion also follows circadian rhythms, influencing the way the body responds to a meal.

From The Complete Guide to Fasting:

Almost all our hormones, including growth hormone, cortisol, and parathyroid hormone, are secreted in a circadian rhythm. Circadian rhythms also help govern insulin, which affects weight gain, and ghrelin, which controls hunger—leading to practical implications for eating patterns and weight loss. Insulin and Nighttime Eating Circadian rhythms have evolved to respond to differences predominantly in ambient light, as determined by the season and time of day. It is believed that food was relatively scarce in Paleolithic times and was predominantly available during daylight hours. Humans hunted and ate by day, and once the sun went down, well, you just couldn’t see the food in front of your face. Nocturnal animals may very well have circadian rhythms more suited to eating at night, but not humans. Given that, is there a difference between eating during the day and eating at night? Well, the studies are few, but perhaps revealing. In a 2013 study, two groups of overweight women were randomly assigned to eat a large breakfast or a large dinner. Both ate 1400 calories per day; only the timing of the largest meal was changed. The breakfast group lost far more weight than the dinner group. Why? Despite following similar diets and eating about the same amount, the dinner group had a much larger overall rise in insulin. An earlier 1992 study showed similar results. In response to the same meal given either early or late in the day, the insulin response was 25 to 50 percent greater in the evening.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This study showed that the group eating breakfast showed greater weight loss and waist circumference reduction.

I suppose this makes sense, active muscles will uptake glucose throughout the day limiting insulin spikes. I wonder if this would also happen in a keto/carnivore population.

I've yet to read Dr Fung's book, its on the list! It looks interesting.

[–] xep@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unlike The Diabetes/Cancer/Obesity code, a lot of it is anecdotal. Most of the science is in the last third of the book for some reason. You could skip more than half and still get most of the important takeaways from the book! I still found it useful since I've not done any fasts longer than 16 hours before.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

16 hours

The key is to eat too much. I try to just eat pemmican (I should post my recipe again now we've moved twice) my pemmican is just dried meat and rendered suet.

The recent batch was thicker than usual, so when I cut it up each piece was maybe 30% larger than normal

I put a piece on a plate, ate maybe two thirds of it and was full. But I left it in front of me, so over the next hour I picked at it until I had eaten it all.

I didn't eat anything the next day

[–] xep@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I would love a recipe for pemmican. Looking forward to it!