this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
511 points (98.9% liked)

Political Weirdos

1133 readers
263 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I never understood this idea that we always have to have compassion for the dead.

They are dead, while having compassion always has value, there is more value to having compassion for the living.

I’m guessing it’s to comfort the living who fear being hating after they die

[–] absentbird@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think there's also a degree of picking on someone who can't defend themselves.

[–] Septimaeus 7 points 2 months ago

Precisely the reason. It’s seen as dishonorable, unsportsmanlike, or a form of cowardice, to attack the defenseless. Some cultures also have a kind of social pact to either speak well or remain silent, but the rule against attacking those who can’t defend is fairly universal.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think in this case, the solution to both of those issues is: if you dont want to get picked on, dont be a piece of shit people want to pick on

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

every now and then i'm reminded of the fact that rich people in medieval times would sponsor bridges and build a little prayer cubby next to them so people could pray for their souls

like, can we go back to that maybe? it might be a bit less easy to hate rich people if they paid for bike lanes all over the country..