politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I hate how stupid my fucking country is.
"Biden failed. This we can agree on." "but.... But, maybe Newsom!"
I also fucking hate it here.
It's the same people who then say Clinton and Harris only lost because they're women
Yeah it's going to be Newsom vs Vance and the left will scream that it should have been Bernie and that they'll be voting for Jill Stein.
Almost like this has happened before but the Dems will intentionally not learn from their previous mistakes
According to the left anything the democrats will do is a mistake.
I like how the left sidesteps that whole issue by not running anyone.
Leftists have been very clear about why the Democrats are failing their voters. A party that supports Capitalism can not support workers, simple as.
You can start listening to them and stop trying to bully them into submission any time you feel like engaging in reality.
People would listen if they actually showed up. If leftists are so numerous then it shouldn't be a problem to get many candidates elected. See mamdani. But in general they do not.
So either that many leftists don't exist or their policies aren't actually that popular OR theyre too lazy or ideological to go vote.
Either way, it ensures "establishment" candidates go on to the general election.
The only time your voice matters is in the voting booth. Far too many eschew that.
Lefits show up and vote all the time. But the DNC keeps pushing them out of the race, so that they don't get on the ballot.
Yeah...if that were true leftists would have the numbers and get people on the ballot. Or you're just admitting that leftists are not nearly as numerous as you claim.
Again- look at Mamdani. Over 25% of voters hadn't voted in a primary in over a decade. They finally decide to do so and ta da, a leftist wins the primary.
Oh, you mean when they finally get a leftist to vote for, they show up to vote? Crazy. Who could have seen that coming?
Leftists demonstrably vote, but not for right-wingers, so the DNC should probably stop kicking leftists off the ballot, and stop running right-wingers.
The only thing leftists have in spades are excuses.
I wish you people would put up or shut up.
I say this as someone who WANTS those policies but of course the entire world is against leftists somehow and youre never short of reasons why you lose so goddamn often.
Well, we also have votes. But if you ignore all of the data showing how we show up to vote when given the option, but are not given the option, then you won't see it.
I guess. I don't see the sense in letting the right wing drive the car off the cliff because the car is not moving quick enough to your goals but you do you.
And you should be showing up all the time is the point. Including primaries for all positions.
The only way to overcome the inertia in the Democratic party is to, you know, actually participate every time. But in general primaries are very sparsely attended affairs and all these people with such great ideas don't put forth a candidate or at the least don't show up to move them past a primary. C'est la vie.
Honestly this is a good reason why the left is and will always be mostly ineffectual as a political movement.
When you're not fighting yourselves over who's the most ideologically pure you're spouting shit like this.
Not "anything" the Democrats will do, just the great, vast majority of things. Like running terrible candidates, on unpopular platforms, screwing over the voters, fighting to keep popular politicians and polices from getting on the ballot...
Then maybe we should offer the left a candidate that they'll vote for. It'd be a nice change of pace.
The progressive party offer a progressive candidate? How absurd.
Usa has a progressive party???
No, it's going to be Newsom against Donald Trump Jr. , In an epic battle of Kimberly Guilfoyle's exes....
(Yes, she was married to Newsom, and then engaged to Junior for years before they split up)
Do you think that’s news?