this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
16 points (86.4% liked)
Space
1997 readers
63 users here now
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
Related Communities
🔭 Science
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I would guess it uses some NN model for collision avoidance or something. I would argue basic automation is not AI, because if it was, Turing's Enigma breaker would have been AI as well as every computer program ever written.
AI has always been a marketing term, I've seen top researchers struggle to define it. And that's alright, but it has to be hammered home that any article vaguely mentioning AI might just say "computers" instead.
Maybe one definition I can stand behind is "a computer program made to probabilistically replicate expected outputs by regression using known but not necessarily labeled examples".