this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
632 points (99.4% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3385 readers
1141 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes.
Post news related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Cool that they can just do this.
yeah, it turns out unelected, lifetime appointees with the power to interpret the law with no oversight was a bad idea.
Technically, Congress can impeach supreme court justices, but that depends on Congress being functional, which it hasn't been for a long time.
impeachment in US governance has always been a joke and a partisan cudgel used or withheld on the whims of whoever happens to be in power, with some notable exceptions.
Case in point: the only Supreme Court Justice to be impeached was reinstated because the proceedings, instigated by then-president Jefferson, was very unambiguously politically motivated.
Never said it wasn't a political process. I guess what I'm saying is that I'd like a more functional and representative congress that can keep rogue judges in check. And maybe term limits on supreme justices.
If they don't have to explain themselves, then they shouldn't expect one when the angry mob shows up at their door 🤷
Kavanaugh did, in a concurrence. I strongly disagree with his Opinion but at least he put words to paper. the others didn't, so I assume the conservatives are fighting about the legal basis for their ruling.
they will have to eventually explain themselves at least, once this case makes it to the regular docket.