this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
748 points (92.8% liked)

Science Memes

16948 readers
2331 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 214 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I don't think dinosaurs were taking x-rays of beaver tails, my dude. Go read a book sometime.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't velociraptors have xray vision though?

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's why they're called velociraptors.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought they were called like this because of their love of bicycles.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Jaws was never their scene.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, you're thinking of the much more dangerous "acceleraptors". Velociraptors were very different from how they are commonly portrayed.

[–] railwhale@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So then distanceraptors are yet to be discoverd?

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, much like how brontosaurus was later discovered to be a mix of bones from various individuals, "Distanceraptor" is actually a conflation of multiple Displacemosaurids.

[–] ellohir@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry to break these news to you but in 2015 they discovered that Brontosaurus actually existed, so the "it was a mix of other species bones" is wrong, as much as a fun fact it was 😟

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the fascinating read! It seems like the specific taxonomy is still far from certain and needs validation, by the study authors' own admission, but you're absolutely correct that it wasn't the bones of multiple species! I could swear there was another one of those from Germany that was a mishmash. Do you remember what that one was? I'm just a geochemist, not a palaeontologist. But anyway, I look forward to seeing validation studies by others of the 2015 findings! It would be great to see all of that hard work pay off! Do you know of any? I wasn't able to find any from a cursory glance around the internet.

[–] ellohir@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

No, sorry, I just remembered the rebuttal of the fun fact, but I'm not into paleontology so I don't know about the rest.

[–] zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago

This may seem cheesy or pathetic, and I apologize for that, but I want to say: thank you for catching me off guard with your silly comment and giving me a badly-needed smile and laugh when I'm fucking miserable and in a lot of pain. It's been a while. Seriously, I appreciate it. You're a hoot :)

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Idiot, why do you think We can see all their bones?