this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
574 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

16977 readers
1186 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I feel like you might be doing something wrong.

[–] AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why? Seems like a reasonable amount. In the boxes i used there was place for i believe 80 tips so when i had to pipet something in a 96well plate with multiple components that where not able to be mixed before i sometimes got through multiple boxes in a single session. (And yes i wish i had a digital multi pipet but even then it would not have alwqys been possible to use it.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

I was joking, honestly. There are both multitip pipettes and experiments requiring a ridiculous amount of separate wells to be filled, both which will make a box disappear.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Multi-channel pipette goes brrrrrr

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Having to dispense a different volume to every sample goes faaaaack.

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's why you use pipetting robots. Just sit back and watch the show.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also used a heap of tips (unless it's the kind that washes, those are weird)

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know. They're definitely not environment friendly. Still much better than manual pipetting.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It takes the resources it takes. Can't just go "we're stopping doing science because it uses plastic, sorry everyone".

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah. True. I'm a programmer of those things and I make an effort to be as efficient as possible with tips, ie mixing with the same tip and compensating accuracy for it. It's more difficult but worth the effort imo.

Also reuse for things like reagents makes a big difference.