this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
574 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

16967 readers
1536 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 143 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I used to work in a warehouse that made a HUGE deal about the employees using the proper recycling bin so the company can get a nice check from somewhere or other for "going green"

This warehouse recieved thousands of pallets every day.

Each pallet is wrapped with hundreds of square feet of plastic wrap.

Each box is individually wrapped with maybe 10ftsq-50 depending on size.

Each box contains goods in plastic bags. Many of them with plastic clamshell packaging.

The products get unwrapped, and placed in larger boxes on shelves.

When the items get distributed to stores, the items were put in plastic bags, boxed up and wrapped in plastic wrap, boxes placed on pallets that were automatically wrapped by machines in hundreds of square feet of plastic.

None of the plastic from the warehouse floor is separated from the general waste.

Remember, it's your responsibility to reduce waste.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 77 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I loathe the trend to blame the end consumer for their waste and eliminate very publicly visible things like straws when the vast majority is caused by industry every step of the way. The amount of plastic I see in retail garbage bins is sickening, and the average customer has no clue because it's all long before anything ends up on the shelf.

Then people stop using plastic cutlery and think they're helping the planet meanwhile it's just a facade to keep the real wasters off their radar.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also, I would LOVE to buy stuff not wrapped in plastic, but it doesn't exist. There are no glass bottles of milk anymore, no soy-butcher

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

glass costs and weighs significantly more than plastic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thorry@feddit.org 41 points 2 weeks ago

I've seen the same or even worse. Pallets of stuff would be received, all wrapped up tight in an ungodly amount of plastic. The pallet would be unwrapped, plastic discarded and the contents scanned to confirm the correct items and number of items were present on the pallet. After each item was scanned and it's serial number recorded, someone would go to validate the items. When validated and found to be correct, the items were again stacked on a pallet and wrapped by another ungodly amount of plastic. The terrible thing was, as I was outside of the distribution chain, I had a view on the bigger picture. Items would often go through several of these places, each doing the exact same. The amounts of plastic each item consumed in the process was huge. But it was necessary, errors were found often, so the steps needed to be done. And the pallets could often get wet, nobody would accept soggy cardboard, so it needed to be wrapped.

The issue is plastic is basically free and extremely good at what it does. A more permanent solution like encasing the goods in some other material, like wood or metal would be more expensive and do a worse job. It's similar to asbestos, where the solution is so good, nothing else can compete. It took a mighty effort and strict laws to mostly abandon asbestos. I fear humanity has lost its will to live and won't have it in us to ban single-use plastic.

Some places did use metal trollies instead of pallets, but the pallets were never really a problem. They were almost always made from sustainable woods, be re-used often, till they just about fell apart. After which they were sent out for recycling, either back into a refurbished pallet, or a stamped recycled wood pallet or other recycled wood product.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

It'd be great if more and more companies packaged their foods through EcoEnclose or similar.

It'd be even better if this was made default by legislation that eliminates the need for good will.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 65 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I work in healthcare and sometimes I think about the amount of waste I generate in a day and it's wild

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Health of humans is always excluded from plastic reduction laws and for good reason.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, I would rather healthcare and science used 5x as much plastic as they do already and everyone else had to go completely wasteless than try to put any undue limits on them.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 17 points 2 weeks ago

Tbf, I remember the times we reused everything, even tubes.

And it was a mess and there is so much evidence that the whole process of reusing is even worse for the environment.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Plastic recycling in the home is basically a scam, but at the scale of a hospital where you're generating large amounts of the same (known) plastic that's going in its own bin, it's much easier to recycle. I just bought a bunch of recycled PET that mostly came from medical waste.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, I've worked at a number of hospitals in the US and never seen a recycling receptacle for our waste. Our waste either goes in a biohazard bag to be incinerated, sharps containers to be disposed of (altho not sure in what way), or a regular trash can to presumably in a landfill.

Not sure if other countries are different, but I can't imagine they sort through our biohazard waste bags for plastic materials.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Its a matter of scale. If labs went through pipette tips the same way that fast food joints went through plastic straws, they'd be banned too.

[–] Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And we don't throw pipette tips in the ocean, we throw them in the biohazard box. While not better for the environment, at least we don't choke baby turtles.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

The lab is a much more controlled environment. I trust a lab tech to dispose of the tips as per protocol, which could reduce the number of tips that end up as litter.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

How many of them get incinerated? I know most large hospitals near me do that but do they take the waste from the gazillion small labs & diagnostics places?

In the three countries I worked in (netherlands, belgium and usa) all level 2 lab waste was collected in biohazard boxes and taken to special lab waste management. I assume they get the same treatment as hospital waste. We did have the non-biohazard labs in which pipettes just went in the normal trash. I assume you can't get a biohazard lab approved without organizing special waste pickup.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 13 points 2 weeks ago

No they wouldn't. Banning straws is politically expedient, not effective policy. Straws are a tiny drop in the bucket of plastic waste. But they're visible, largely optional, and have alternatives. It's easy to make them look bad so a politician can look big by banning them. Your average person can feel like they're making a difference by buying a reusable straw. The industrial scale plastic waste that happens out of sight is allowed to continue because nobody cares about actually doing anything. Everyone wants to feel like they're doing something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

People in America who use pipet tips: probably 10k People who use plastic straws: 300 mil

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

The straw thing seems like such an inconsequential place to start over things like switching to bar soap and bar shampoo to avoid using so many plastic bottles.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All you need to do is walk on the side of a busy road and look in the ditch to see what people just throw away.

It's not a lot of shampoo bottles, but tons of plastic cups and accompanied straws.

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Anecdotes aren't a great way to measure this. Observations like this are variable by location, and ignores the much larger mass in landfills or unrecycled stockpiles.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How much shampoo are you going through???

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Think of it in scale. It's not just you. It's millions of people. Even if every household only used one bottle over one year that still would be tons of tons of (easily to avoid) waste. And of course it's a lot more than one bottle a year.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Because you can't say the same thing about straws or other single use plastics?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 weeks ago

Straws don't pollute the oceans if you throw them in the trash. Well, unless that trash gets processed badly. Where I live trash gets burned. So I make sure to throw some straws in the river so the sea turtles can do coke off each others backs 😎

[–] Tuuktuuk@piefed.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

How about people driving those trucks that directly dump mixed waste into the ocean? That's a very common thing to do in South-East Asia. Plus, there are a zillion villages everywhere around there that dump all of their mixed waste into creeks going through them – to be brought "away". Into the oceans.

That's where almost half of all microplastic comes from. Then there's the other approximately half that comes from cars' tyres. And then a part of a percent that comes from drinking straws and such. Hooray.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

lab rats who use a pipette robot that eats boxes of tips:

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I recently saw paper straws for sale in a carboard box with a cutout so you could physically touch the straws. Naturally, I was revolted.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

My headcanon says that this used to have a plastic window instead, until someone pointed out that having a plastic window in packaging of paper straws is ridiculous, so they decided to remove it. A package redesign without a window was also proposed, but was rejected for budgetary reasons.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Biodegradable "plastic" too expensive for that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Recycling companies who ship bottles to India landfills/sea because recycling too expensive:

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago

Simple. Don’t throw them in the ocean. Why are you throwing them in the ocean?

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

LoL. Just autoclave them

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I feel like you might be doing something wrong.

[–] AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why? Seems like a reasonable amount. In the boxes i used there was place for i believe 80 tips so when i had to pipet something in a 96well plate with multiple components that where not able to be mixed before i sometimes got through multiple boxes in a single session. (And yes i wish i had a digital multi pipet but even then it would not have alwqys been possible to use it.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

I was joking, honestly. There are both multitip pipettes and experiments requiring a ridiculous amount of separate wells to be filled, both which will make a box disappear.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Multi-channel pipette goes brrrrrr

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Having to dispense a different volume to every sample goes faaaaack.

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That's why you use pipetting robots. Just sit back and watch the show.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›