this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
395 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

16989 readers
1172 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 49 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Are we absolutely certain it didnt evolve so that humans have to keep it going? Maybe that was it's plan all along?

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

damn, i had so much arguments with creationists around myself recently, that just the words "plan" and "evolution" put together make me unhappy

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

plan and evolution together feels eugenics-y, yeah that makes me unhappy too

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

tbf, if we extrapolate ad absurdum, not reproducing with the first mature enough person we meet, and rather chosing partner based of arbitrary traits we wanna see in our kids already sounds eugenic-y

i was talking more so about a hlant doing adaptaition "with purpose in mind"

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That weird, because all of our farmed crops and animals are selectively breed, which means planned evolution (usually, but I guess some ancient examples were purely accidental). Evolution is just the process of selection to perpetuate offspring. It being planned or unplanned doesn't matter. Creationism is just not talking about evolution at all usually.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

yeah, you're right, but, i guess i've chosen my words poorly, as you're arguing not about what i had in mind.

OP asked about the end purpose of ihe reproductive mecanism of said tree going so complex, it can no longer reproduce, wether it did that, so we would reproduce the the tree ourselves instead. They obviously said that half jokingly, but i still was trigerred.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maize can't grow naturally because of the husks, it needs humans

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maize didn't evolve naturally, we created it. Teosinte on the other hand is generally eaten and shat back out before germinating

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I watched this video a few weeks ago. It's fantastic https://youtu.be/dYHEwTQHt24

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wait, you can't just bury an old ear of corn, you gotta take the husk off? TIL

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have no idea, but I would imagine if you bury if it could maybe still work. Not on its own though. The ear isn't a seed though. It's a large cluster of seeds. The natural ancestor corn evolved from looks more like wheet, but obviously still not like the wheet we know.

i was thinking more "you're burying the entire fruit" than "you're burying a single seed" but i didn't make my assumptions clear.

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I have a new topic to watch a YouTube video about at 3 am