this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
666 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

17038 readers
2409 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I side with you, though the experts call me stupid for it too.

if for all n < infinity, one set is double the size of another then it is still double the size at n = infinity.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You're not stupid for it. Since it makes sense.

However, due to the way we "calculate" the sizes of infinite sets, you are wrong.

Even integers and all integers are the same infinity.

But reals are "bigger" than integers.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I know it seems intuitive but assuming that a property holds for n=infinity because it holds for all n<infinity would literally break math and it really doesn't make much sense when you think about it more than a minute. Here's an easy counterexample: n is finite.