this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
328 points (96.6% liked)

RPGMemes

13856 readers
567 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skua@kbin.earth 71 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I suppose you could cast see invisibility or true seeing first? But... yeah if I'm GMing you can just target the invisible wall, fuck that. Same goes for how RAW it's nearly impossible to destroy the red layer of a prismatic wall because every spell that deals cold damage explicitly only targets creatures

[–] JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago

Tired of pesky adventurers always seeing your tricks? Try applying Invisible metamagic to conjured Fog today!

[–] jounniy@ttrpg.network 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Oh definitely. I assume that RAI this is the intention.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

In a pedantic thread re: RAW, you misspell "definitely". More than once. 🤌🏼

[–] jounniy@ttrpg.network 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Oh gosh that’s wild. Whoops.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I thought it was funny, to be fair 🤣

[–] jounniy@ttrpg.network 1 points 9 hours ago

I actually think it’s funny too.

[–] jounniy@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah I thought of that one as well. It’s one of those weird cases of imprecise wording.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

To be pedantic, the issue is actually caused by precise wording. The wording is so precise it limits it too much. The wording is too precise, and inaccurate.

[–] jounniy@ttrpg.network 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

To be very pendantic, it’s the other way around: The wording as very precise at describing both spells, but quite vague at describing their interaction. That’s what leads to the problem.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I would say that's a lack of accuracy, not precision. If it was less precise than it's work on more things, and be less focused on one particular thing. If it's more accurate than it is better at describing all targets.

Precision: Is your grouping tight.

Accuracy: Are you aiming at the target.

Precision without accuracy is you very narrowly describe what it does, but you miss the desired target (the player being able to use the spell in a reasonable way).

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

If you can target an invisible wall, it introduces a lot of ways for things to go wrong. The spell caster is taking elements on faith and making assumptions, and those can be subverted...