this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
172 points (98.3% liked)

politics

25921 readers
2120 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The messages, casually exchanged last weekend in a crowded, public space, show high-level officials in the Trump administration discussing the deployment of the Army’s 82nd Airborne, an infantry division that has been parachuted into combat zones in both world wars, Vietnam and Afghanistan. If the administration were to send in the Army division, it would almost certainly be challenged in court under federal laws limiting how the military can be used domestically.

Archived copies of the article:

There is also an editor's note — apparently deputy Homeland Security adviser Salisbury decided to use Signal to exchange information about this while attending a funeral in Minnesota.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but a gun is commercially available, while basically no Americans know how to rig an airbag initiator as a blasting cap

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

... Wait does the GNO3 in an airbag initiator actually explode? I was under the impression it just rapidly burns - which was the whole reason for its selection, since the exhaust gasses produced catalytically are at a much lower temperature than those produced through uncatalyzed combustion. They'd make a terrible blasting cap if I'm right, though. Maybe one of the old ANFO ones would work, but those are both rare and by now pretty unstable.

Idk, why wouldn't you just use regular old lead azide? Pretty much everyone in the US can get their hands on the materials to make it, and lots of us even made it in highschool.

FWIW explosives aren't actually illegal outside of a few specific locations in the US (hell I can get jars of it at the grocery store). That, a 30.06 round and a hobby rocket E-match has made for many a disappearing pumpkin at the annual vegan turkey hunt.

I guess if you really had to an airbag initiator could be made to work, but like... why not just use one of the many off the shelf components we have available?

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

I guess the stability of the device and its ability to detonate electronically rather than with a firing pin, etc. which would be easy enough to wire into the flight computer.

Now that handles detonation but getting a light weight package that’s also large enough to deliver might be a challenge. However, I guess it depends on the destination. Size isn’t always important.