this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
676 points (99.3% liked)

Tech Support Memes

3149 readers
73 users here now

Memes about IT and computer related things, funny screenshots, or things you see out in the wild.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 110 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Fuckin thumbs.db and lost+found hiding on every USB stick.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What drives me batty about thumbs.db is that on a modern high end machine with an nvme drive it's not meaningfully faster then just regenerating thumbnails on demand every time, and in fact can be slower under some circumstances. Yet there's no "I don't need this turn it off" option.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What about remote drves though?

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For whatever insane windows-y reason, having a thumbs.db file on a network share is one of those slower scenarios for me. Which is odd because you'd expect that to be the kind of situation where it's actually useful.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Seriously fuck thumbs.db anywhere it can be found.

THIS IS WHY NTFS HAS ALTERNATE DATA STREAMS, USE THEM YOU FUCKERS YOU CREATED IT.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Alternate data streams look like normal files but with an appended identifier.

For example test.txt:stream1 is an alternate data stream of test.txt. Move or copy the file and the ADS goes with it.

They can be created like other files (“echo > test.txt:stream1”)

You can see them with “dir /r” at the command line.

You can even have an alternate data stream with no corresponding file. In my opinion this is what thumbs.db should have been.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

you are shitting me, that's so cool. This command only works for NTFS?

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Back 20+ years ago I used alternate data streams to his my collection of files (the ones you find online as a teenager) behind a text file. You can shove anything you want (I think) in them, even including extensions to make sure it opened in the right program (i.e. test.txt:malware.msi).

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It works, and yes only on NTFS… but many applications may not be able to open these “files”.

It’s actually sort of a weird historical thing, goes back to the roots of Windows NT in VMS and also compatibility with Mac OS (classic) and its “resource forks”

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

OMG you're taking me back to ResEdit

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes well you’re not wrong.

Although I use ext4.

For Linux, the equivalent is Extended Attributes, although they come with significant limitations.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Easiest fix, change the folder view to another, like "list", then back and it won't be locked anymore. Might take a second or two, but will unlock.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not sure what you’re talking about. “Locked”?

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You mean list? Click these icons and change the folder view from icons to something else, like "list" or "details", then thumbs.db can be deleted without windows bitching.

You can also change under View menu at the top.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

No I mean “locked”.

I don’t care about windows bitching about these files, I am offended that it shits them (and “desktop.ini”) all over everywhere.

It’s a total hack, and pathetic for a company the size of Microsoft.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Or as my parents call them, "A virus!"

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have lost+found on my Linux drives... what am I doing wrong?

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

Nothing.

If you run fsck (filesystem check), it will look for blocks of data that look like files, but have no actual filename attached. Simplified, that can happen as a result of unexpected shutdowns (like kernel panic) or IO conflicts (where one process deletes the file but the other writes data to where the file used to be). If fsck finds such "lost files", it will put them in lost+found on the respective volume.

If you have trouble with missing files after a crash, it might be worth looking for them there. Otherwise, it probably doesn't matter.