this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
121 points (92.3% liked)
Technology
76945 readers
3280 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The AI said that graphite tips on the control rods was a great idea! Let's get this low power test done for The Company, it'll be great! Worst case scenario, we just hit the AZ5 button and harmlessly scram the reactor with no problems!
The AI designed this test plan and gave a bullet pointed list of reasons it's completely safe. What could possibly go wrong?
Just a moment, have to fly this helicopter directly over a giant glowing hole, AI says it's safe.
From xkcd
All the emoji will help users read and understand!
It wasnt graphite tips, you should probably look into it a bit more, the hbo show was quite misleading
Per the IAEA report on Chernobyl, page 4:
Yes, those "tips" were like 2 meters long, basically, instead of just being breaks, the rods had dual function and also acted as accelerators, when they pressed az-5, they didn't enter first, they were already in the core, but something happened which I don't understand where once az-5 was pressed as those tips started lowering an imbalance formed and they they got stuck and it resulted in a runaway reaction, I think at least that's accepted as the most likely theory as IIRC they don't exactly know what happened.
I could be mistaken but wasn’t the issue that when the rods were fully withdrawn the graphite was also partially withdrawn so when they scrammed the first thing that happened was an insertion of positive reactivity from the graphite which was enough positive reactivity to burn up all the xenon which then caused the reactor to go prompt critical?
Like the presence of the graphite wasn’t that bad but it combined with a lack of interlocks and improperly trained operators was the big problem and of course trying to start up at the peak of a xenon transient is never ideal