this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
1041 points (94.4% liked)

memes

18657 readers
2372 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 176 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

I wonder what problem the original sign addressed. Because forbidding turning right for 2 ½ hours every morning sounds extremely specific, and sounds like one neighbor in particular had some beef with another or something, and got the city to put up the sign.

And maybe that neighbor left, or whichever problem was being addressed didn't exist anymore.

I know that's a thing because a long time ago, we had a "15mph - blind children at play" sign in our street, until someone pointed out that the blind child in question was now an adult and had moved out years ago, and the sign was just annoying everybody for nothing 🙂

In other words, the guy might have replaced a useless sign with another, equally useless one on his own dime. Maybe he could simply have called the city to wonder what the sign was for, and possibly have it reviewed and removed altogether.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 187 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Given the original sign covered 7-9.30am seems like it's to prevent people cutting across traffic during peak commuting time either to prevent accidents or improve the flow of traffic.

There is a guy down the road that used to have someone riding down his street with a loud muffler and blaring music trying to hyped up for work every morning around 8:30 So instead of putting a sign up that said no turn between 8-9, he figured if he put up a sign that said 7-9:30 it would seem specific and no one would question it. They would all think it was curated by engineers and traffic studies. Nah, dude just wanted to sleep in because he worked nights.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah true. But I reckon it was worth asking.

Also, sometimes, all it takes is asking a carve-out to make your life easier.

For instance, he could have asked the city to add an "except residents" sign under the existing one. At least where I live, you'd be surprised how accommodating the administration can be if you simply ask nicely with a good argument.

Hell, he could have added the sign himself for cheaper and I bet none of the other residents would have complained about it 🙂

[–] errer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Realllly depends on the city. Some places won’t even reply to you for months, and when they do it’ll be a bullshit answer because you’re not of the developers bribing them with millions of dollars…

[–] PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There is a sign like this at the end of my street. It’s morning and evening rush times. The turn in question is an offset intersection through a busy road. If you are to take a left off my street you can easily be hit by someone taking a right from the street across into the middle of the road to then take a left from the perpendicular road onto my street. The city put some surveyors out there for a bit and with the accident data and all that determined my street can’t make our left at certain times but the street across can snake their way across town just fine. The 2 streets on either side of mine are just fine to left turn from, they don’t have the offset intersection. Nobody gets pulled over for the turn either but I’m sure if you caused an accident you would get an extra citation.

[–] bklyn@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago

Also, kids on their way to school

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Likely a school zone. Most of these signs are because there are children crossing the street and they don't want them to get hit by cars.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But my commute! You don't understand it's so long if I don't put school children at risk!

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is how I feel about OOP and people thinking it's hilarious how they messed with the sign.

I just see another entitled car brain who thinks they should be allowed to do whatever they like.

Feel you brother.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's to try and prevent people from cutting through a neighborhood during rush hour. Common in more gridded cities.

[–] user_name@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Yes; also, I’ve seen it in more suburban areas, too, near a school as a way to protect the children from cars.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago

If you bring it up, then it could end up in some bureaucratic limbo where nothing ever gets done. And then afterwards if you go to change it yourself they’ll figure it was you. So maybe easier just to change it yourself in the first place?

[–] hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's a sign by my house, on a road I need to turn right on at about 420 every day, that says no right-on-red turns between 730am to 430pm on school days.

It's frustrating, because it doesn't seem like it's actually protecting children for 9 hours a day

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Sounds like you should find a fun 10-minute activity to start at 4:20.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Maybe he caused a 50-car pileup and killed hundreds of puppies.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

School kids probably

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

His sign wasn't useless, the new one was about 20% less useless.

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hissjgn

Seriously, do people just hit "save" or "post" without even glancing at what they wrote?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Now you're making me self-conscious about my ninja edit rates.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It prevents backup. If the light goes from green to red on a major road, then arterial traffic stops (just like it is supposed to). Now, a crossroad dumps in a new batch of cars that backfill the next block. When the arterial light turns green, those cars now have nowhere to go. It's not too long before you have cars blocking part of the intersection between light cycles out of frustration. Or, at least that is the case near where I live.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 2 points 2 days ago

I had one of those by my house, not in the residential area.

Morning turners would back up the lane into another light, so the sign was just to cover up for bad traffic design