this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
342 points (93.8% liked)

Fediverse memes

2481 readers
300 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
Specific
  1. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (7 children)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Those who literally deny the existence of the massacre in the Tiananmen Square, claiming that "nobody was killed" (or far more rarely, unapologetically stating that if they were, then they deserved it). Basically far-left extremists that exist in a world of "alternative facts" just like conservatives, the common denominator being that and simping for authoritarian regimes.

Words like "consent" tend not to matter to those holding that ideology.

img

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 45 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"Tankie" does not come from Tiananmen Square, that is a common misconception. The term "tankie" is 33 years older than the Tiananmen Square massacre.

It originated to describe people who supported the 1956 Soviet Union military intervention in Hungary. Stalin sent in a bunch of T-35 tanks to crush the Hungarian Revolution. He was successful, and thousands of people died in the process.

Ever since then, "tankie" has been used as a derogatory term against Stalinists, Marxist-Leninists, communists, and leftists in general.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

To be fair, tanks seem to be a favored tool of these oppressive regimes. I'm personally not against communism, they have some good ideas like universal child care, guaranteed jobs, and housing (even though the latter may be considered sub-par by some). The problem comes when these fucking authoritarian cheerleaders come out and say communist governments were never oppressive.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I'm personally not against communism, they have some good ideas like universal child care, guaranteed jobs, and housing (even though the latter may be considered sub-par by some).

Tankies never seem to get that that part is not being critized, but the subversive of the movement by authoritarians.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Extremists like to use "alternative facts" or whatever other tactics achieve their goals. The means does not matter to them, only the ends, which they feel self-righteously justifies anything to achieve.

And then separately from that, gullible people also exist too. It is a bias that we all could fall prey to, though some of us seem more on guard against it than others.

(Tbf, many of those claiming those alternative facts are quite aware of just how nonfactual they actually are - they simply do not care as power, rather than correctness, is all that there is to them.)

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except you'd not get that healthcare and the rest if you didn't pay people off.

In theory it might seem fine, but in reality it was just a dictatorship, and quite a brutal one too.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except you’d not get that healthcare and the rest if you didn’t pay people off.

eh docs and nurses are pretty fucking cool but don't work for free. of course you're going to pay people off, they need wages ffs

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Communism = no currency. There doesn't seem to be a whole lot of knowledge regarding communism in here. A bit of an echo chamber. It's funny how so many can hate something so much without actually knowing what it is they're hating. Ha.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

...I'd prefer a single payer system where no one went without. Broke my nose while living in the UK and was impressed with their no bullshit system.

you can have democratic socialism of many flavors without going full on communism, and you'll never get to communism from here, abjectly shittified capitalism. I'd prefer denmark over...well, where has communism worked?

Like, I respect the medical professionals Cuba produces but would never want to live there.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats a really interesting bit of history, thank you for the additional context

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Their name references a genocide, I doubt in good faith

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Krono? Or are you referring to someone else in this thread?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think it is a common misconception, I think it's pretty common knowledge (at least among the terminally online) that it started with the Hungarian Revolution.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

It seems more common knowledge for people actually in Europe. Many people in the USA seem to have never really heard the word. Especially the younger generations (which since this is a memes community... does seem slightly relevant to your statement, as I would expect a broader populace here as opposed to a community dedicated to discussions of world-wide import).

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

The term mostly had been invoked by anti-authoritarian leftists derisively toward anyone who still supported the Soviet Union. In time, the usage generalized to apply broadly to authoritarian leftists, such as Marxist-Lenininsts (or Stalinists).

Now is it largely misused by liberals to designate anyone strongly critical of Western imperialism, which includes everyone from anarchists to campists.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have so many questions. I guess I never viewed as "tankie" as left.

Hell, I consider myself far-left to the point of being a progressive, almost to the point of being an anarchist.

But my reality is rooted in actual facts.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tiananmen denial is hardly the only qualification for the term. That's an example of typical behavior, not the definition.

It's also far from the worst thing red fascists have done so it's just so weird how hard people focus on it. At least talk about gulags and kulaks sometimes, damn

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

I seem to have conflated multiple things there - that is a common test that is often used to determine if someone is to be labeled as a "tankie", but yes is not its actual definition.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Basically far-left

we need a better topological geometry for these concepts, especially for these wacky edgecase fuckers like tankies. yeah, far left, like, you stand here, I'm going to move to your left until I've come around on the other side of the planet far far far far away left.

imho the vast majority of them are ccp click patriots waiting for the taiwan invasion to kick off.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hehe, somebody was way ahead of you there...

img

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

It seems to work so well 😁

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The framing of separating the "authoritarian left" from the actual left is basically accurate.

Why is "Far Left" marked as a trademark?

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because of intellectual propriety.

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did you intend "intellectual property"?

Regardless, I understand the meaning of the symbol, but not its applicability to the context.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At a guess, it might be intended to depict the concept of True (as in Genuine, Authentic) Far Left?

If so, I would argue that a corporate symbol does not match perfectly with the ideals of a Far Left, so I'd give it a grade of A for process (summarizing a lot of information into just one symbol) but only a C for outcome. It seems better if it had simply been removed entirely.

Then again, it's easy for us to criticize, and it was harder for someone else to have created it initially, so props to whoever did that - overall I think that the image conveys a lot and is a good match for the concepts (that one symbol aside).

Also, to me it seems obviously tongue-in-cheek, not meant so much for actual conveyance of teaching real information so much as to provide a bit of brevity surrounding the topic. (Usage of the word "fuck" aside, there's also "whatever", which seems not congruous with like an academic - even at the Wikipedia level - discussion of the reality of the topic matters, chiefly since it lacks precision.) Then again, I could be wrong.🤔

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the concept is effective at lest in exposing the inaccuracy of horseshoe theory.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah I presume - though I have no idea, really - that horseshoe theory is what it was being tongue-in-cheek TO.

And it seems remarkably effective in that goal, as evidenced by many people (other than myself) continuing to share it. It offers a nice balance of simplicity and complexity, at least in the sense of going one level deeper than left vs. right.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's supposed to be funny.

The political extremes are often more exclusionary and sometimes holier-than-thou, which is why it's funny to say that you have exclusivity for the Far Left™ label. But as a leftist I also think that property is theft, intellectual property is not proper, hence... propriety.

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

I suppose. I feel the message is clear and accurate without the joke. With the joke, concerns about the anti-authoritarian left are being unduly exaggerated.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s a pejorative used for anti-leftist authoritarians who unironically insist their extreme-rightist ideals are somehow leftist.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They usually do.

[–] Grazed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I find that when people use this term I get suspicious. It could be used to describe authoritarian Stalinists, Maoists, Marxist-Leninists, or just communists/socialists in general. I wish that posters would be more specific, because everyone and their mother has a different definition of "tanky". It often comes across as a thought-terminator. I'm not up to speed on the Lemmy beef, so I have no idea who's right, but I've seen like 10 posts about tankies and none of them really defined the term, which is very frustrating.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tankie would be ml or militant left

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Ostensibly left (soc/comm) pro authoritarian.

load more comments (3 replies)