this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
373 points (99.2% liked)

World News

51887 readers
2211 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Interest rates dropping, prepare for inflation, and prices, to surge.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ill gladly refinance my mortgage, but at what cost?

[–] Yankee_Self_Loader@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

what cost?

Closing?

[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Depends on the lender but usually like $4-8k. It's bet that you won't want to change the terms of the mortgage again until your balance is lower than it would be otherwise.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

PSA for those needing the reminder: Anyone with any savings should be keeping it in a brokerage account (eg Fidelity, eTrade, Vanguard, etc). Savings accounts at banks don't pay you anywhere near enough interest to keep up with inflation. But with a brokerage you can put that money into a managed fund, which is in turn investing it into the parts of the economy where all the value is going, returning that value to you at like 5%-20% per year. It doesn't need to be a 401K account connected to your workplace, it can just be a standalone account with regular tax. Even after the gains tax it's like an order more growth than a savings account and usually outpaces real inflation. Even if the fund's holdings include things you don't find 100% ethical, it's likely what a bank is investing your savings account money in anyway - Just without sharing the profits with you.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What a fun game. The only way to earn interest is to fund capitalistic ventures that got us here in the first place.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

The only way to earn interest is to fund capitalistic ventures that got us here in the first place.

I mean sure, but that's what the bank does with your money anyway when you put it in a savings account.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are there enough shares for everybody to buy? If not and people only own index funds then where do those funds put the money?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stocks are arbitrary units of corporate account and companies always want new investors, if there's so much demand for their stock that there's no supply they just issue more stock. But open-ended mutual funds - The type I'd recommend investing in - Aren't priced by share because they aren't traded on exchanges. They're priced by a similar metric called Net Asset Value or NAV. Investopedia explains it better than I can.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

companies always want new investors

They also buy back shares and reduce their shareholders.

The ROI will drop if companies have too much money.

But open-ended mutual funds

That just shifts my question. What can those funds buy?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It depends on the fund. Mutual funds have a prospectus that defines exactly how they'll behave. Some funds leave room for management discretion while others are almost mechanical. They make their holdings public, so you know exactly what they're composed of. I don't think there's much limit on what they could buy, it's defined more by the strategy of the fund.

Does that answer your question? I wasn't really even sure what you were asking just doing my best to be informative.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's helpful but I am worried about something else. Imagine an Island with 100 inhabitants and $10 each. If there are only 2 companies for $200, what do the other 60 people buy to avoid inflation?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As they're a completely disenfranchised social majority on an island with a population tiny enough for everyone to know everyone else and a robust enough technological base to justify something like a stock market, they buy nothing and successfully institute anarcho-communism! :D

But to take the scenario seriously: Assuming that there was still demand for the shares among the population, the people seeking shares would offer more money for them than they were originally worth, until some of the people who own them considered it worthwhile to sell. If this alone doesn't sate demand then the two stock-issuing companies would almost certainly issue more stock, ideally enough for them to raise more funding but not so much that the increased supply overwhelms demand and drops the price per share. They could also split the stock: Every share in circulation instantly becomes two shares, worth half of an older share at time of split. Depends on which market outcomes the companies are seeking. But basically the response to your scenario is that stock issuance is completely arbitrary (Within regulatory limits, whatever they may be) and up to the issuing company, and a market with demand is a market that will be offered shares because to a company it's just fundraising waiting for the taking. The only thing they can't do is disappear stock in circulation, if they wanted to remove stock for some reason they'd have to buy it back from holders on the market.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

The problem is that shares cannot rise arbitrarily in price because the value depends on the profits.

On the other hand, if there are no new business opportunities, handing out shares decreases profits per share and thus also their value.

I want to show that not everybody can invest their money in funds or the ROI would crumble.