this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
475 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

9998 readers
2421 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Just saw this comment.

Yes, you are completely right. That's likely also the reason for your confusion regarding OSI, since you appear to compare it to TCP/IP in a rather literal manner.

Obviously TCP/IP is better at describing TCP/IP than OSI, though while OSI also can be used to describe TCP/IP in a sub-optimal manner, TCP/IP cannot be used to describe OSI.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

I can’t believe people are actually arguing with this guy. I gave up. Try asking him about frames and the media layer.

Not sure what the point of this kind of troll is.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

That’s likely also the reason for your confusion regarding OSI, since you appear to compare it to TCP/IP in a rather literal manner

Uhh, no, not really. That literal comparison was my attempt at explaining to you why the two are not equivalent models since you seemed confused about why I would say that. Normally, I'd just stop at "OSI is a theoretical model that exists but was never practically implemented, TCP/IP is used instead." Because honestly I thought that was fairly self-explanatory. It's kinda 101-level stuff in networking courses at uni.