this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
353 points (97.1% liked)

politics

26918 readers
2262 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has confirmed that he wore compression socks to treat his cankles amid growing scrutiny over his health as America’s oldest president.

In an explosive interview about his medical treatments, Trump also admitted that he applies makeup to his hands, saying that the large daily dose of aspirin he takes to thin his blood causes them to bruise easily.

The Daily Beast has led the way in reporting on Trump’s efforts to hide his swollen ankles and the globs of makeup on his hands. Other media outlets largely ignored these issues, and the president and his inner circle have adamantly denied that he had any problems.

But in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, Trump said he wore medical compression socks to help with swelling in his ankles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 137 points 1 day ago (5 children)

He can't remember when he's supposed to lie about shit.

One of these days we'll stop electing 80+ year old dementia patients to run America

[–] tym@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

we're about to get 10 years of the couch fucker, come hook or crook.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

No we wont. The uneducated will continue to believe what Fox, Facebook, and X tell them to believe.

America has an idiot problem, and it wasnt an accident.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

....

Yes, they will

But you realize we can educate people right?

Like, someone that uneducated today only stays uneducated if no one educated them, and whether or not you want to "help" them, we're all better off if we educate them.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Teaching critical thinking is really a "childhood only" thing, it's very hard to get that into people after their minds are set and there are fallacies at work keeping them attached to their opinions.

Growing up in the 90s, we had classes in "media consumption" that taught you how to examine the claims made and the sources behind them. Rule #1 - news should be dispassionate, if you're hearing something passionate, it's not news.

Looking back I realize our teachers saw the information wars coming, and decided to do something about it. Sadly my parents never got this education and so every Facebook meme is true in their eyes.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

it’s very hard to get that into people after their minds are set and there are fallacies at work keeping them attached to their opinions

Brain plasiticy doesn't come into play until the mid to late 60s...

It's why it's acceptable to give up on a 70 year old boomer, but not really anyone else.

There's a concerning amount of accounts arguing we need to write off teenagers that were dumb enough to vote trump before their brains have even finished developing.

Point being, giving up on voters is only good for a very small demographic.

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

if you think you can just educate people into not supporting trump, listen to The Necessary Conversation podcast. these people care more abt "winning" than being right

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

these people care more abt “winning” than being right

They need taught something?!?!?

Clearly that's more than enough reason not to attempt to teach them anything...

If we taught things to people who don't those things, just think of the horror!

Obviously our time is best spent telling others not to try anything and just fucking give up. Maybe listen to some fucking podcasts and pat ourselves on the back about how we're intrinsically better? We won't fix anything that way, but it makes you feel superior and that's why the billionaires have spent so much effort into you having these views you think are your own

I know this is harsh, but wake the fuck up, we need all hands on deck.

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

you must not have much personal experience with these people. at some point you gotta know how far you can get with them, otherwise you will burn out and become horrendously cynical. btw i never said we should just give up and listen to podcasts. im just offering you a window into a family split down maga vs progressive lines and how they (the magats) will do anything to justify their position rather than listen and absorb new information.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder if his dementia will progress to the point where he starts inadvertently reliving old, sick Epstein memories while live

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Ewww... No one wants to see the hard toadie.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think this is a big reason they're so desperate for people to stop talking about it...

trump would admit to wild shit a decade ago, he's undoubtedly worse now. Someone asking him ""what's the youngest woman who's slept with you?" In a "nice" manner would likely get him to just openly admit to raping a child.

If it's not phrased in a way that he gets defensive, he's liable to just fucking answer.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

"What is the age of your youngest partner?" would be a great question for him to be asked, and a skillful interviewer could absolutely get him to answer with pride about his misdeeds as he describes several instances of varying levels of horror before arriving at the single event he thinks TACOs all.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

You haven't been paying attention. Trump gained younger voters in 2024. He didn't need "boomers" to become President. He needed money, lies, and young men to vote for him, which they did.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Largely due to a psy-op using “new media” and influencers.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

Maybe covid changed things enough but I wouldn't be surprised if what happened with his first term happened again. Basically when I was in highschool circa 2016 there was a solid group of guys who supported him by the time we graduated in 2018 that had more or less evaporated, and amongst my friends the opinions shifted from ambivalent at worst to outright venomous at best by 2020. But then again we're all on the older half of gen z so we overlap with millennials on a lot of things, perhaps it's another generation jones situation.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

I doubt it. With the caveat that unless Donvict and pals completely fuck up/stall out/reverse breakthroughs in medicine - dementia may become a thing of the past, I suppose.

But I seriously doubt there is any substantive difference between people born between arbitrary years, labeled "boomers", and any other set of people born between arbitrary years.