Europe
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
view the rest of the comments
What the fuck?
They seem content to inform the rest of the world that they like to gurgle the combined balls of the group of narcissistic idiots who currently are speedrunning the 4th Reich from the white house.
If they are this brazen with it we're probably about to go into what seriously could be a modern recreation of the dark ages.
What would you do? With russia being an active threat, with Ukraine desperately needing supplies, with the EU replacing russian gas with US gas, etc., etc., what would you do in this situation, while knowing that the guy who ordered the attack is a malignant narcissist with dementia?
I know I wouldn't try to appease someone who clearly doesn't give a fuck either way. Someone needs to tell him to fuck off for a change, I bet he'd be confused for a solid 24 hours afterwards.
Granted, I live right next door to Russia, and as such have less to fear from the US than most.
That doesn't work on malignant narcissists.
Check out this video interview (and here is a short with "the gist of it") with a psychologist who explains what malignant narcissism means in the context of Trump.
Not in the long run. It'd be interesting to see how he'd react in the moment.
He's a malignant narcissist for sure, but he's also in severe mental decline at this point. He's also not used to getting bullied, although there's some of that from his childhood buried down there as well.
He might not react like you'd think due to those two factors alone.
The fact that he has dementia works as a disadvantage for the sane world.
People with dementia often react with anger and violence when they get confused. So, it's not "his malignant narcissism being restrained by his dementia", it's "his malignant narcissism is being boosted by his dementia".
He knows as well as anybody that the US' military power is unprecedented and unstoppable. There's literally nothing the EU could do if the US decides to take Greenland by force, so the only hope we have is to placate him until midterms, and pray to all the gods that the Democrats win a sweeping victory.
Never said he'd be restrained, especially after he's done processing to whatever degree he's able to. Anyway, it was a thought experiment, nobody is going to tell him to fuck off until it's too late. Everyone will be too busy "placating" him.
I wonder how your scenario plays out if they decide you don't really need midterms, or more presidents for that matter? Just a dictator, and when that old fuck dies who do you think will take over? The couchfucker? Not likely, he's even more of an idiot.
It's likely that a strong EU or whatever is left of NATO after ya'll fuck off is the only hope for a chance in hell for some kind of peace somewhere on the globe for a little while more.
If it becomes a full on totalitarianism and there's no civil war, we're plain and simple fucked.
I can't stress this enough: there's no military power anywhere near the level that US military is on.
For context: the top four most powerful air forces on the planet are:
And then China.
They're so fucking OP it's not even funny.
Those four are still composed of messy human elements. You can kill your own civilian population for sure, but then you have no nation anymore. I also highly doubt everyone in all your military and espionage branches are willing to start gassing people without any armed resistance.
I mean, good luck with that.
You keep thinking in black or white while reality is usually not that simple.
I feel like you're jumping from "US has super strong military" to "US is literal Fourth Reich and will build death camps", but I don't know why.
My point was: if EU takes an aggressive stance against Trump, they risk a literal EU-ending catastrophe. If EU tries to placate him, they risk losing Greenland - and that's probably temporary too.
I'm not saying they'll start exterminating the population, but eliminating the EU military would be more than enough - russian hordes would then do the rest, assuming US doesn't go all "see, now you need our protection, here's the bill".
How do you think fighting all of Europe and your own population at once would go for the US military, especially a fractured one? You're not hiding any of it from anyone either, unlike what could be achieved back in the 1930's.
Even if Russia joined in on the other side I doubt it'd be fun for anyone involved. China would certainly enjoy it for a while but that's about it.
You already have what could be called death camps in your soil. They tried to kick out their undesirables before they resorted to killing them in the third Reich, too. Except for the ones that started dying imminently, of course. You're not hiding those camps from anyone either, not in 2026 and not as long as the internet exists.
I bet Venezuela will be such a nice place to live after the US will "use the oil money and put it back to the Venezuelan people", too. Nobody believed that, absolutely nobody. It's quite the lie to say that while simultaneously taking away all safety nets from your own population. Come on, seriously?
This is assuming the US population would do anything.
Like, most probably they will, but it's not a given, considering the military still adhered to a lot of illegal orders recently - the deployment of Marines to LA was most probably illegal (that's at least debatable), the killing of random people on Venezuela's seas was 100% illegal, the invasion itself was illegal (no Congress approval) - all of this makes me think that they wouldn't have too much trouble attacking the EU too, even though a large portion of them trained with the EU troops for decades, even fought alongside them in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Me? No, I don't have any death camps on "my" soil.
You wrote "If it becomes a full on totalitarianism and there's no civil war, we're plain and simple fucked." earlier. Either you're American or you're not, pick one.
Read that again, mate, but slower. Nothing in that sentence suggests I'm an American, quite the opposite, actually.
In that case your views are even dumber, seeing as you're stating things left and right on random like they're hard facts. Note that I haven't necessarily disagreed with you, merely stated that things can go several different ways and we don't know anything for sure yet. Yet you're still clinging on the belief that your view on the matter is the only correct one and everyone else is dead wrong. Dangerously arrogant, that.
I'm sorry, what...? Please elaborate.
How is it surprising that I stand by my own opinion...? That's what opinions are, mate. I'm stating facts about US military strength, and opinions about how a potential war between US and EU would go. I firmly believe that the US - even without the European bases - would roll over EU, because EU is reliant on US tech for comms and intelligence.
You haven't even attempted to refute any of that, just went for "you're arrogant". Come on, be better.