this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
1203 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

5195 readers
1532 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

Transcript

recently my friend's comics professor told her that it's acceptable to use gen Al for script- writing but not for art, since a machine can't generate meaningful artistic work. meanwhile, my sister's screenwriting professor said that they can use gen Al for concept art and visualization, but that it won't be able to generate a script that's any good. and at my job, it seems like each department says that Al can be useful in every field except the one that they know best.

It's only ever the jobs we're unfamiliar with that we assume can be replaced with automation. The more attuned we are with certain processes, crafts, and occupations, the more we realize that gen Al will never be able to provide a suitable replacement. The case for its existence relies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to do everything we don't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

they’re both wrong, and they’re both right

an AI can create concept art for a writer to better visualise their world to generate ideas in a pinch, but it shouldn’t ever be what you use to show anyone else: you still need real concept art

an AI can also create writing for their art so that they can flesh out a back story to make their visual art more detailed, but it’s not going to write anything that you’d want anyone to read as a book or act in for a movie

both things can be used for the described purpose, and both things are inadequate for quality output

we’ve had this juxtaposition for a while: “redneck X”… they’re scrapped together barely functional versions of the thing you’re trying to do, on the cheap, with home-made tools. you wouldn’t sell it, but it’s kinda fine for this 1 situation with many many asterisks

professionals often don’t like when someone can hack together something functional because they know the many many places where that thing falls down when you talk about long-term, and the general case… but sometimes a hack job solves a specific problem in a specific situation for a moment for cheap and that’s all you need

(just don’t try it with electricity or your health: the consequences of not understanding this complexity is death… of course ;p)

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

an AI can create concept art for a writer to better visualise their world to generate ideas in a pinch, but it shouldn’t ever be what you use to show anyone else: you still need real concept art

so... if it's only for creating visuals for yourself and not for showing anyone else... I already have a perfectly fine imagination that I've been using for that purpose for as long as I can remember. Maybe it's useful for these people who I've been told have no imagination, but to me, it seems awfully redundant.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago

there are different kinds of imagination, and there are different kinds of being creative… just because someone isn’t visual doesn’t mean they aren’t creative: especially when you’re talking about writers

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

So artists who photoshop images they find on the internet into a collage to visualize their idea have no imagination? Artists do this all the time especially if they need to communicate their idea to others and get little time to conceptualize their ideas on paper.