this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
1203 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

5195 readers
1532 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

Transcript

recently my friend's comics professor told her that it's acceptable to use gen Al for script- writing but not for art, since a machine can't generate meaningful artistic work. meanwhile, my sister's screenwriting professor said that they can use gen Al for concept art and visualization, but that it won't be able to generate a script that's any good. and at my job, it seems like each department says that Al can be useful in every field except the one that they know best.

It's only ever the jobs we're unfamiliar with that we assume can be replaced with automation. The more attuned we are with certain processes, crafts, and occupations, the more we realize that gen Al will never be able to provide a suitable replacement. The case for its existence relies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to do everything we don't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The only good AI I've come across is the one I use for denoising cycles renders in Blender3D, as that's something that a human cannot reasonably do.

That's the only scenario something like AI has any use as a "tool"; doing things humans cannot reasonably do.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Good news. There's absolutely zero "intelligence" involved in computer functions doing math. No "AI" needed or detected as usual.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, I know. It's just a neural net. Still a calculator, just with more steps than a human can sift through. And they call that intelligence.

[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unexpected blender tip. Thanks for that, hope it improves my render times 😉

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Here's another for you:

Play around with sample sizes and render tile sizes in the performance menu (same place where you find the denoising options).

Depending on your set-up, you can see a drastic improvement in render times by choosing smaller tile sizes. Sample size is also counted per render tile, so you could get away with very low sample sizes and have a completed render with an overall higher combined sample size.

[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Did not know that about the tile size. I never worried to much about performance as my previous laptop had plenty of grunt. But that blew up and now I'm on a 10 year old machine that was tired when it was new. I need everything I can get 😆