this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
743 points (93.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

10140 readers
1744 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm sure there's at least one marxist that's verified on bsky, does that mean jack dorsey is a communist?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would mean that communism is acceptable to him. What's tripping you up here?

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So does that mean Dorsey is a nazbol since he agrees with both communists and fascists? There are neoliberals on bluesky as well, how does that affect our triangulation of his beliefs? I'm not saying you have to agree with how the company moderates its platform, but clearly as far as bluesky is concerned allowing someone to use the platform is not an endorsement of their views. It can't be, because they allow people with diametrically opposing ideologies to use their platform.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Allowing them on the platform doesn't mean a full endorsement of the belief. It means that he (or whoever makes the decision) finds the belief acceptable enough to platform.

There is likely some line which is too far, and not allowed on the platform. Perhaps "eating live babies"? "Kicking puppies"? Something that is so unacceptable, it would not be allowed. This argument is that ICE and Nazi stuff belongs on the far side. That as a platform owner, you can say "that's not allowed here".

Allowing one person to say "I think the NY Yankees are the best" and another to say "I think the NY mets are the best" on your platform (eg: website, newspaper, bulletin board) doesn't mean that you personally believe both. But if you let someone post "I think white people are best" and just leave that up, that's saying that's an acceptable message to say. Just harmless like talking about baseball.

This argument is some positions, like what ICE is doing, is outside the range of acceptable. The platform (a website in this case) should say they have to take that elsewhere.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I have zero disagreements with this comment. My read of the top level comment was pretty literal, which is a tendency I have that gets me into trouble sometimes.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just a quick side-note: Dorsey is no longer in charge of Bluesky

Jay Graber is

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

clearly my commitment to showing my entire ass online is easy for me to stick to