this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
667 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

20532 readers
1503 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“But it also takes a lot of energy to train a human,” Altman said. “It takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart. And not only that, it took the very widespread evolution of the 100 billion people that have ever lived and learned not to get eaten by predators and learned how to figure out science and whatever, to produce you.”

So in his view, the fair comparison is, “If you ask ChatGPT a question, how much energy does it take once its model is trained to answer that question versus a human? And probably, AI has already caught up on an energy efficiency basis, measured that way.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 100 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The humans still exist and need food, even if they are replaced by chatbots in the workforce. The comparison is therefore useless, unless you plan to murder the unemployed.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

unless you plan to murder the unemployed.

Well, that's precisely what some of the Trump-aligned fascists are suggesting on live television.

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What the shit

Also

involuntary lethal injection

as opposed to voluntary?? He's trying to soften the language by adding that (totally redundant) extra adjective to remove focus from the 'lethal' part

How the fuck does involuntary soften the language?

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago

A modest proposal

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Plan is obvious... to me. Why not so to everybody else

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

I don't but the police work for me since I am a billionaire and they can murder the unemployed for me!

but PER QUESTION how many kilowatt hours are they using. not just in their heads, in their hearts and in their booties.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

To save the working man, you've got to put him out to pasture

                 Soup us Good Food - Dead Kennedys