this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
100 points (83.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

40778 readers
429 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I warn about AI. I don't care about AGI (yet) because we are far from it.

I'm worried about (in no particular order):

  • Software companies amassing technical debt because AI-generated code gets used without proper review
  • Massive security problems in critical infrastructure, for the exact same reason
  • Cost savings being used to make the rich richer while the people who used to do the work are just fired
  • Companies forcing AI into every single product even if it doesn't make sense, just to make their shareholders happy
  • Rapidly increasing prices of RAM, SSDs, HDDs, graphics cards and consequently pretty much all electronic devices
  • The environmental impact because companies would rather build new power plants than optimize AI for efficiency
  • A lack of education about the limitations of current implementations. People tend to feed every question they have into ChatGPT and trust the results even when they're completely incorrect
  • The inherent privacy nightmare that comes from funneling that much data into a centralized service

Nothing about this is small or cute.

I would be totally fine with something that I can supervise and that can run locally on my laptop without cooking it and doubling my energy bill. Also an economy where productivity gains benefit the workers, not the CEO. If I can do the same work in half the time, let me have the rest of the day off at full pay instead of doubling my workload and firing half your staff.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hey! They also destroy communities by forcing them to pay for infrastructure upgrades while the companies get tax holidays in return for a bunch of jobs that only last 2 years during the construction phase and only add about 25-50 permanent jobs to the local economy long term.

Let's also not forget bringing back mothballed coal plants instead of building new ones.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nothing about this is small or cute.

Compared to AGI it is. We don't know how far away we are from creating it. We can only speculate.

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 9 points 1 day ago

Compared to AGI it is.

The same way the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombs are small and cute compared to a modern hydrogen bomb...

If we don't solve the AI problems we already have, there is no point speculating about AGI because our lives will be unbearable long before it arrives.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AGI talk seems for now to be merely hype to get investors.

LLMs seem likely to be dead end for any logical thought: https://www.forbes.com/sites/corneliawalther/2025/06/09/intelligence-illusion-what-apples-ai-study-reveals-about-reasoning/ This means at the end of the day you just get a sloppy illusion with no useful coherence as soon as it exceeds the complexity of a literal lazy copy&paste job: https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/mit-report-95-percent-generative-ai-pilots-at-companies-failing-cfo/

There is currently no technological innovation to fix this. Instead, AI progress seems to be stalling: https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/experts-concerned-ai-progress-wall

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

We could've never invented LLMs and I'd still be equally worried about AGI. I've been talking about it since 2016 or so - LLMs aren't the motivation for that worry, since nobody had even heard of them back then.

The timescale is also irrelevant here. I'm not less worried even if we're 500 years away from it. How close to Earth does the asteroid need to get before it's acceptable to start worrying about it?