this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
470 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

19502 readers
998 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] excral@feddit.org 33 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

It's always hillarious to me to see boomers on expensive bikes that aim to save every gram while they could save 20kg on themselves.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago

Or skinny dudes with enormous ballsacks wearing tight Spandex on 15 pound carbon fiber bikes, but a 20 pound motorcycle lock.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

If you are trying to lose weight, you should be using the worst, heaviest bike possible.

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 11 points 5 hours ago

Well, not if you still want to have some fun while doing so.

But I agree, that a regular bike should suffice and you don't need to worry about optimizing gear weight if you're not competing for anything and just ride it for your own well-being.

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well, not necessarily. A bike that's got a full carbon frame also absorbs shock and vibration from the road better. This means you can ride longer distances without getting fatigued in places like your wrists or ass. Longer rides = more exercise.

But once you have a carbon frame, chasing grams on other components gets to be a bit silly.

[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You could also just walk whenever possible, burns more kcals/distance

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

That's less efficient time-wise though, since it takes significantly longer to walk the same distance riding.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

That's a stationary bike

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 15 points 9 hours ago

Perhaps that's why they are on a bike?

[–] psoul@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

Well, it’s also fun to go places you know. If a shitty bike can only get you 20mi / 30km but a on a good one you feel confident doing a 30mi / 45km ride then the purchase makes sense.