this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
1011 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

83150 readers
3377 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Using CRISPR-Cas9, scientists engineered a yeast to produce the nutrient feed. Farmers could have it in two years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] manxu@piefed.social 162 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Get outta here with your sensible, practical solutions! ;-)

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 73 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Seems easier than engineering edible yeast to get them the sterols they need.

[–] skyline2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But you see they can sell this! Can't sell "fallow fields"...

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Yes well known fact we shouldn't research any technology to reverse the collapse of our biosphere or to alleviate climate change. Wouldn't want anyone being able to sell that tech. Best we just turn off the lights and plant some flowers.

I love planting some flowers, but we're going to need technology to undo the mess we created.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fellows can sell seeds for fallow fields, my friend. never fear for they will forage, and be fine.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Didn’t use fertile or follow or falter. Fine folly.

[–] Ascense@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Frankly, foul folly feels fitter.

V, is that you?

[–] protist@retrofed.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"They" being the University of Oxford?

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Plenty of companies have been founded by former university researchers based on discoveries they've made while at said universities. Seems like nothing prevents those folks from patenting the newfound methods for themselves.

Or, they will license the technology to a big manufacturer. Seeing as the University of Oxford is probably ill-equipped to produce industrial amounts of yeast.

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

You would be surprised, yeast vats and breweries have a ton of overlap, IE pretty cheap tanks and reasonably standard infrastructure. Most universities with a biology research wing are going to have a few bio-reactors, and while they may not be able to produce the feed itself industrially, they can easily breed starters to sell to places like breweries and companies that already produce yeast at massive scale.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's it! I'm calling my beer brewing vessels 'bio-reactors'! No more carboys for me!

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I mean, yeah. What did you think a bio-reactor was but a really fancy carboy?

There is some nuance in amenities, but at the end of the day it is a temperature-controlled and sterile environment for microbial growth to take place.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But Brawndo has the electrolites that plants crave!

Just in case the joke is too far of a stretch to make the connection, what I'm saying is the obvious simple solution isn't profitable.

They'd rather sell you a solution that doesn't actually work, then give you a solution that works that they can't make profit on.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 1 points 1 day ago

Who is "they" in this case

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 day ago

It also doesn't degrade ecosystems further.

Bees aren't just the domesticated honey bees.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 5 points 1 day ago

In the end, it probably isn't easier at all. Once the yeast is created, yeast is dirt cheap and easy as hell to grow, and wouldn't require managing a field of wildflowers that are going to drop seeds for the following year when you intend to plant crops there. I'm not saying it's a good or ethical choice, but the yeast definitely has the potential to be easier and cheaper

[–] manxu@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I found that pretty weird, too. Not only that, but you can't get that yeast for the next two years. Your method works yesterday haha.