this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
802 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

11198 readers
2724 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 138 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Well but see the intent isn't to render it unfit to be reissued, the whole point is that you want it to stay in circulation so as many people as possible see the additional message.

[–] drath@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

This is legalese. The

"with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued"

probably relates only to the

"or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt"

part, and not the whole

"Whoever mutilates, cuts, defaces, disfigures, or perforates, or unites or cements together"

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 19 points 21 hours ago
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

No. If you can't spell out "rapist" on facebook without being canceled. you sure as hell can bet your butt on a dollar note with that remark not staying in circulation. and you're supposed to know that. so if you write that on a dollar bill, i don't think it's "plausible deniability" to say "i considered this dollar bill fine for further circulation".

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

You wouldn't need plausible deniability because the prosecution would have to prove that your intent was to make the bill unfit for circulation. Intent is already notoriously difficult to prove in a court of law, and it would be very difficult to prove someone wanted to take a bill out of circulation by writing a message on it that they hoped would be seen by people.

Even if the result is that the bill gets taken out of circulation, the court would have to prove that you knew that would happen and wanted it to.

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What are they gonna do? Take every note out of circulation?

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

It’s a win-win!