this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
120 points (91.7% liked)

Privacy

9443 readers
268 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

A CCTV setup likely won’t work for people who just want a video doorbell.

But replacing a Ring with something like a Reolink means they can start with the same service, and over time move to RTSP and a local server as they become more aware of privacy implications and are driven to invest in a contained system.

Likely people will never go CC though, as the entire point for most people is to see what shows up at their door when they’re not at home.

I use reolink at my office.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

There are ways to see what's at your door when you aren't home that don't rely on third parties having access to the footage at least

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Frigate NVR and Netbird VPN. I don't use it like this, but it would work excellently.

[–] mos@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is Reolink something you can see the live video remotely? I could see a motion detection system at your doorstep that lets you know someone is there but you'd have to be able to login somehow to get a view.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Reolink doorbells allow you to configure them how you want; you can use a cloud-hosted feed, cloud-hosted notification only, self-hosted feed, self-hosted notification only, and write-to-microSD only. They can use WiFi or wired Ethernet.

I have mine set to do cloud push for notifications, RTSP to my internal home server only; so I log in via VPN if I want to see the video.