Selfhosted

61959 readers

1037 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

[AIT] The Codeberg ban on LLM content (aussie.zone)

submitted 1 month ago by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

137 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Right - I see the other topic has been locked / author hasn't returned to follow community rules.

Here's the original topic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49003386

and a measured (IMHO) response to it. (BTW, do your self a favour and change tabs with that site open :)

https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/i-regret-migrating-to-codeberg/

It's a tough spot, Codeberg has found themselves in and I wish them luck. But beyond that, this is (yet) another reminder that in 2026, if you don't self host it, the cloud is just someone else computer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is a good chance that LLMs are sufficiently transformative that courts will decide they don't infringe the copyright of their sources.

How much money are you willing to put in to test that?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

5 Zimbabwean dollars.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So then why are you asking other people to on your behalf?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm, maybe the bits of my post that you didn't quote contain the answer.

First though you need to understand I'm mainly saying I don't buy their justification.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, you made a large assumption that this holds up in court completely, predicated on the idea that anything but would be disastorus.

I don't buy that premise, and neither does codeberg. So again, why should they put money up in that assumption?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I made three claims and you talked about a single one, and not in a substantive way.

This conversation doesn't seem to be going anywhere interesting or useful, so goodbye.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And all 3 hinge on the premise of courts will do 'sane' things, without any kind of justification for them. So yeah, all 3 are moot if you remove that assumption.

So how much money should be risked on that bet?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Jesus Christ, I didn't think I was being subtle.