this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
193 points (100.0% liked)

Satisfactory

2228 readers
1 users here now

The unofficial Lemmy community for Satisfactory, the factory-building and exploration game.

Useful Links:

Similar Communities !automationgames@lemmy.zip

Looking for Group?

@MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz started a dedicated server and welcomes Fediverse users, find out more by DMing them or joining this steam chat

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content
  4. No ads/spamming

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They scale just fine. Plus, they have no ongoing fuel or electricity costs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What better way is there to run 40 parallel conveyor belts?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

But making it wider really complicates trying to join in or separate out conveyors. When they're all in a single stack, it's easy to add a splitter or merger or route a new conveyor in or out of the stack. None of that needs to cross other conveyors to get where it needs to go.

Also, there's no automatic guide to building side-by-side belts, so they'll always end up not quite parallel, and I think that makes it uglier.

More difficult to actually build as well. Laying the first foundation layer of stackable supports is kind of a pain in the ass, but once you have the first layer, it's very easy to add more layers on top. In order to build side-by-side stacks, the tedious work of laying the bottom layer has to be repeated multiple times.