this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
219 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
219
Amazing (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] D3FNC@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Convincing your kidnappers you're on their side is not stockholm syndrome.

Actually coming to believe it yourself despite the kidnappers not actually valuing your life, against your own material best interests, is the traditional definition.

[โ€“] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Sure, but the traditional definition is based on a real hostage situation and it is specifically based on how those people acted while still being held hostage. Once they were free it turned out that they didn't actually enjoy being held hostage and didn't love their captors. Convincing their kidnappers that they were on their side is pretty much all they were doing.