this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
86 points (86.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42579 readers
570 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why do companies advertise on YouTube when their ads are only used to annoy people into paid accounts? I never see anything, I am interested in.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 103 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Because adverting works, yes even on you.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I hate this line of reasoning. I hate what advertising has become. Whatever advertising gimmicks might work on me, way more is wasted on gimmicks that at best I ignore, and at worst actively deter me from purchasing whatever they're selling. I'm a net negative as far as advertising is concerned.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Chances are those ads aren't aimed at you.

But even ads you hate leave an impression deep down in your brain.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The problem is, that impression is negative. And it extends to all advertising. I've actually trimmed my Facebook feed down to not having any ads. It's kinda funny looking through my feed as opposed to my wife's that's filled with ads as every other post.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even negative attention is attention. If it bothers you then you’re thinking about it. If an advert bothered you enough to complain about it online or to someone irl then even though you’re not a customer, you’re a vector of transmission increasing their organic reach.

It’s an abhorrent concept.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

But I don't specifically discuss certain ads. My comments on this post are basically my thoughts on it. I hate the way advertising has infested every aspect of life and take active measures to avoid or ignore it.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That may be true, but for every you (and me) that are deterred by some ads rather than inspired, there are more others. If it's didn't work, companies wouldn't spend the money.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

And I think that's some of the issue that has grew to an uncontrollable mess. Advertising companies only care about getting ads in front of the most eyes. Sure some try to target specific audiences, but the terrible and predatory practices have led someone like me to actively avoid any messaging from ads. I'd hazard a guess that trying to limit advertising to people like me, might actually have a positive effect on advertising as a whole. Less wasted resources on such a disenfranchised segment that will not buy what they're selling.

[–] kaffeeringe@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

I think ads could work better if YouTube didn't use them to make the free experience awful. They usually have neither to do with me nor with the content I tried to watch.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know how there's often three sizes of something, say coffee, for example. Small, medium and large. Alternatively it could also be three price tiers; iPhone cheap, iPhone normal and iPhone expensive. Well more often than not the most expensive one is there so that people can go like: "$1499 for a phone?!? Absolutely not, I'll go with the more affordable $999" version" - just like Apple wanted you to.

Customer behaviour is among the most studied psychological phenomenoms out there. No matter how stupid you think some ad is, it still works. It might not make a noticeable difference on individual level, but when you show an advertisement to million people, then it starts showing effect.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

But what you described isn't really an advertising gimmick. I'm aware of the pricing gimmick but how will I know what price an iPhone is of I never absorb an ad? In fact I almost ditched samsung last time I bought a phone (due to their bullshit bloatware which I consider an extension of advertising). It was only because it was the cheapest that I got another one. Advertising didn't positively affect my choice in any way.

[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The thing is, it's quite easy for a marketing department to measure their success. They release an annoying unskippable YouTube and and change nothing else in their marketing and their profits go up by 1% or whatever. As much as I basically do no shopping where the day to day advertising I see can influence it, that's a pretty abnormal lifestyle pattern. Plus I'm still susceptible to choosing specific items inside a shop, and I definitely susceptible when I'm looking for specific products and come across secret ads disguised as advice.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The beer Carling Black Label was specifically NOT advertised because It was determined that's what drew the customers to the product

Edit: I should clarify that over the years it has been variously advertised and not advertised. I was referring to a specific period in Canada. But then like all things, different brand managers take over, strategies change, and they went back to advertising it. They lost a lot of the customers that appreciated the fact that it wasn't advertised, but they gained manyfold more.

[–] kaffeeringe@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wish I could tell YouTube, I can't buy a car or sell a house, I'm not interested in football an I don't wear make up or womens' underwear.

[–] algorithmae@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No, you’re not special. Advertising works on you.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hence why I said whatever advertising does work on me, it's overshadowed by how much advertising is wasted on me. I'm a net negative in the system.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're also a drop in the bucket.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

There are dozens of us! Dozens!

[–] kaffeeringe@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, I hate every single brand that interupts my gardening videos.

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Not on me, I shoved an Uno-Reverse Card up my Nose and now the Ads think about me.

[–] dakar@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Not really, it just has to work on a few people.
With how cheap online ads are, if just 1% of people are stupid enough to act based on ads, it makes them worth it.

[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Life Pro Tip: You're immune to advertizing if you can literally only afford rent and store-brand groceries.

[–] Luke_Fartnocker@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I'm not immune to advertising. I make a point to never purchase anything I've ever seen advertised. If you spend 30 seconds telling me about your product before I watch a 1 minute clip that I will probably regret watching anyway, then I will make a point to never buy anything from your company.