this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
56 points (76.9% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10604 readers
1 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This headline is a lie: a prototype is 10 years off according to the article ๐Ÿ˜ cool research tho. Seems lacking in the practical application side.

[โ€“] abbadon420@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

A cure for cancer was also 10 years off... 30 years ago... and it still is 10 years off.

[โ€“] angrystego@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We do have solid cures for several different kinds of cancers. Cancer is not 1 illness. Nevertheless, I get what you're trying to say.

[โ€“] abbadon420@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Maybe should've gone with cold fusion as an example haha

[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 2 years ago

Well in a kind of way they have achieved their goal it's just that incrementally creeping up on it rather than one big ground event. If you have cancer now your life expectancy is much better than it was 30 years ago. And in 10 years it'll be even better.

Same with fusion. We're getting closer and closer to actually having the technology.

People don't like to hear it but technological development and progress is slow and kind of boring for the most part.

[โ€“] GunValkyrie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It used to be. Still is, but it used to too.

[โ€“] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Agreed, I also have concerns about shooting an electron beam, the accumulated charge on the tow vehicle is going to build up over time.

[โ€“] MuThyme@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think that would happen (very much depends on the set up), but either way it'll just naturally resolve itself. Even in high orbits, there's plenty of gas molecules bumping around, charged things will preferentially bump into things with the opposing charge, so the residual atmosphere can probably carry most of that charge away. It all depends on the relative rates though.

[โ€“] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Yes it can dissipate, but you are likely to see some ESD effects.

Curious to see which bus manufacturer eventually takes it on.

[โ€“] holycrap@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Probably just has a relatively short mission profile.

[โ€“] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

They say their tool is cost effective as it can be used for a long time, so who knows.